Unit Outline
LAW241
Dispute Resolution
Semester 2, 2026
Olivia Rundle
Faculty of Law
Arts and Society (Portfolio)
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B
Unit Coordinator
Olivia Rundle
Email: Olivia.Rundle@utas.edu.au
 
What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
This unit introduces students to a variety of non-judicial dispute resolution processes. Each dispute resolution process will be introduced from both a theoretical and practical perspective. The extent to which processes are used and in what contexts will be considered. By the end of the unit, students should have an improved understanding about the circumstances in which various dispute resolution options are appropriate and an ability to match disputes to process options. Skills of problem solving, reflective practice, conflict management, collaboration and dispute resolution will be encouraged through group learning experiences. There will be an opportunity to role play different participants in dispute resolution processes, including parties, lawyers, third parties and observers. 
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1
identify, explain, justify and critique the nature and theories of various dispute resolution processes.
2
reflect upon and analyse your learning about dispute resolution skills and techniques.







3
diagnose disputes and match them to appropriate dispute resolution process options.







4
critically analyse and problem-solve issues arising in non-judicial dispute resolution processes.
5
communicate and collaborate effectively.
Requisites
REQUISITE TYPE
REQUISITES
Pre-requisite
50 credit points of Introductory units - to do this unit it is recommended that you have completed LAW107
Alterations as a result of student feedback
New AT2 will build from workshop learning rather than a stand alone research task.
 
 
Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
On Campus
Blended Learning
No Description
2
Study Period 8 times
Lecture (On Campus)
No Description
2
Once only
Workshop
No Description
2.50
Study Period 8 times
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online or includes online activities, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline or MyLO, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
Attendance at workshops is necessary to be able to complete the assessment tasks. 
It is expected that self-paced learning on each topic will have been completed prior to attending each workshop.
 
 
How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
Portfolio
Refer to Assessment Description
50 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5
Assessment Task 2:
Dispute Diagnosis Problem
Refer to Assessment Description
50 %
LO1, LO3, LO4, LO5
 
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: Portfolio
Task Description:
Portfolio of work from workshops. Throughout the unit, you will be reflecting upon your learning. After each workshop, you will post reflections on a discussion board.
You will review your reflections twice during the teaching period and prepare a short synthesis. This could be a selection or an overall 'meta-reflection' combining two or more individual reflections.
Each synthesis can either be a 500 word written piece or a 3 minute video. It will be submitted to the relevant assignment DropBox on MyLO.
The two syntheses will be graded and marking criteria carry equal weight.
Feedback will be provided about the first synthesis to support improvement for the second.
Task Length:
2 x 500 words or 3 minutes (25% each)
Due Date:
Refer to Assessment Description
Weight:
50 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Identify, explain, justify or critique the theory, techniques and/or ethical issues involved.
LO1, LO4
2
Apply knowledge to the facts to diagnose dispute resolution needs.
LO3
3
Self-reflect critically upon learning and participation.
LO2, LO5
4
Communicate and collaborate effectively
LO5
 
Assessment Task 2: Dispute Diagnosis Problem
Task Description:
You will advise a client about dispute resolution options to suit their problem, delivered in a one hour online test format. You will meet individually with the assessor to discuss the advice that you have given the client and your reasoning behind it.
Task Length:
1 hour online test plus 30 minutes meeting
Due Date:
Refer to Assessment Description
Weight:
50 %
 
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Identify, explain and justify the topic.
LO1, LO4
2
Critically analyse the issue and answer the question.
LO3
3
Communicate effectively.
LO5
 
 
 
How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
Academic progress review
The results for this unit may be included in a review of your academic progress. For information about progress reviews and what they mean for all students, see Academic Progress Review in the Student Portal.
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
Academic integrity
Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see
Important Guidelines & Support.
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 
Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.
 
 
 
Required Resources
Required reading materials
David Spencer, Lise Barry and Lola Akin Ojelabi, Dispute Resolution in Australia: Cases, Commentary and Materials (Lawbook Co., 5th ed., 2023) ISBN 9780455247090. It is strongly recommended that you purchase your own copy if possible, as access to the library copies is limited.
 
Recommended reading materials
Additional readings will be recommended for each topic in MyLO and the Library Reading List. 
 
Other required resources