| | | | | | | CRITERION # | CRITERION | MEASURES INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOME(S) | | | | 1 | Apply theoretical principles from lecture material to practical tasks, demonstrating understanding of key remote sensing techniques including georeferencing, spectral enhancement, hyperspectral analysis, and image classification. | LO1, LO2 | 2 | Interpret remote sensing images and derived products by drawing conclusions about surface features using spectral signatures, reflectance characteristics, and accuracy statistics. | LO1, LO3 | 3 | Apply image analysis software to generate correct outputs including spectral profiles, classification results, and accuracy assessments. | LO3 | 4 | Communicate understanding of applied remote sensing techniques through concise, accurate, and well-reasoned written responses with clear figures. | LO4 |
|
| | | Assessment Task 3: Assessment Task 3: remote sensing case study | Task Description: | In this capstone assignment, students will conduct an independent analysis of satellite imagery applying classification and change detection techniques in the context of a practical real-world application. This assignment will bring together skills in remote sensing data analysis and knowledge of foundational concepts.
The assignment has two assessed components: Component 1 Progress video checkpoint (10% of AT3): A single 3-minute narrated screen-capture video submitted in week 10. The student shows their ENVI project with training ROIs on the image, explains their training site rationale, and displays their initial classification output.
Component 2 Live presentation and Q&A (90% of A3 = 45% of unit, Lane 1 hurdle): A 15-minute individual supervised session in week 12. The student shares their screen with and delivers a 7-minute narrated walkthrough of their complete analysis workflow, demonstrating live software interaction and interpreting their results. The assessor then conducts an 8-minute targeted Q&A, probing analytical decisions, accuracy interpretation, method comparison, and limitations. Sessions are conducted via Zoom with camera on, and are recorded for moderation. Students must pass this component to pass the unit.
GenAI guidance: Students may use GenAI to find background information during the analysis phase. The live presentation and Q&A must reflect the student's own understanding. GenAI tools are not permitted during the supervised session. | Task Length: | Component 1: 3-minute screen-capture video (submitted to MyLO). Component 2: 15-minute live session (7-minute presentation + 8-minute Q&A). No written report is required. | Due Date: | Week 12 (02/Oct/2026) | Weight: | 50 % | | | CRITERION # | CRITERION | MEASURES INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOME(S) | | | | 1 | Select and apply appropriate image processing techniques, including spectral indices and classification methods, to identify fire-affected areas in satellite imagery. Demonstrate competent use of ENVI software through live screen interaction. | LO1, LO2, LO3 | 2 | Analyse the impact of the bushfire event on the Tasmanian landscape by mapping affected areas, interpreting classification accuracy, and comparing change detection approaches. | LO1, LO2 | 3 |
Communicate the results of the analysis through a clear, structured oral presentation with effective visual support, demonstrating the ability to narrate a coherent analytical workflow. | LO4 | 4 | Respond to assessor questions by explaining and justifying analytical decisions, interpreting accuracy statistics, evaluating method trade-offs, and reflecting on limitations of the analysis. | LO4 |
|
| | |
| | | | | | | |
|
| |
| |