Unit Outline
KDA309
Systems Design
Semester 1, 2026
Vanessa Ward
School of Architecture and Design
Sciences and Engineering (Portfolio)
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B
Unit Coordinator
Vanessa Ward
Email: Vanessa.Ward@utas.edu.au
 
What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
Systems Design is a capstone unit where students demonstrate integrated knowledge and skills through complex, real-world design challenges. Focusing on regenerative systems thinking, this unit connects global ecological and social issues to local design interventions. Students will conduct systems analysis, engage in speculative design processes, collaborate with community stakeholders, and develop environmentally and socially responsible design solutions. The unit emphasises intellectual risk-taking to challenge conventional design assumptions while building professional readiness for practice in interconnected, socially embedded contexts.
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1
Defend design decisions through critical reflection on ethical considerations, demonstrating autonomy in navigating ambiguity and complexity in systems design practice.
2
Generate and refine design propositions through speculation and experimentation by employing a range of processes, techniques and material explorations related to a practice specialisation area.
3
Collaborate with a range of participants and communicate with diverse stakeholders, applying skills in negotiation and critique.
4
Conduct socially and environmentally responsible design practice by considering the implications of design, and its capacity to initiate change in a system.
5
Analyse complex systems using appropriate frameworks to identify leverage points and interconnections within ecological and social contexts
Requisites
REQUISITE TYPE
REQUISITES
Pre-requisite
KDA208 AND KDA207 AND ZAD222 AND ZAD225
Alterations as a result of student feedback
 
 
 
Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
On Campus
Workshop
No Description
6
Weekly
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online or includes online activities, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline or MyLO, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 
How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
Design Brief
Week 4
30 %
LO1, LO2, LO4, LO5
Assessment Task 2:
Design project
Week 11
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5
Assessment Task 3:
Final Design Presentation
Week 13
30 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5
 
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: Design Brief
Task Description:
Map a system, identifying key stakeholders, relationships, and leverage points. Through systems analysis, propose three regenerative design scenarios that address identified challenges. Select and develop one scenario into a comprehensive project proposal with clear rationale for your choice.
Task Length:
Multipage PDF
Due Date:
Week 4
Weight:
30 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Development of regenerative systems map.
LO4, LO5
2
Application of regenerative design principles.
LO2, LO4
3
Critical reflection on ethical considerations
LO1, LO4
4
Quality of design proposition and project proposal
LO1, LO2
 
Assessment Task 2: Design project
Task Description:
Develop your selected design scenario from conceptualisation through to working prototype/pilot implementation. Must include three distinct rounds of prototyping, testing, and iteration with focus on material exploration and technical development. Document the design evolution and how testing results influenced design decisions.
Task Length:
 
Due Date:
Week 11
Weight:
40 %
 
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Iterative design process and material experimentation
LO1, LO2
2
Communication of design decisions and rationale
LO1, LO3
3
Quality and resolution of design artefact
LO2, LO4
4
Integration of responsible design practices
LO1, LO4, LO5
 
Assessment Task 3: Final Design Presentation
Task Description:
Document and present your resolved design project for public exhibition. Create professional presentation materials that communicate your systems approach, design process, and outcomes to diverse audiences. Include visual reflection on your design journey and contribution to the field.
Task Length:
 
Due Date:
Week 13
Weight:
30 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Professional communication and presentation skills
LO1, LO3
2
Quality of exhibition documentation and design artefacts
LO2, LO3
3
Demonstration of critical reflection and independent practice
LO1, LO2
4
Evidence of contribution to systems design field
LO2, LO4, LO5
 
 
 
How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
Academic progress review
The results for this unit may be included in a review of your academic progress. For information about progress reviews and what they mean for all students, see Academic Progress Review in the Student Portal.
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
Academic integrity
Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see
Important Guidelines & Support.
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 
Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.
 
 
 
Required Resources
Required reading materials
Ichioka & Pawlyn. 2021. Flourish. UK. Triarchy Press.
Meadows. 2008. Thinking in Systems: A Primer. US. Chelsea Green Publishing.
Warden, J 2021, Regenerative Futures: From sustaining to thriving together 1 Regenerative Futures From sustaining to thriving together.
Wahl DC 2016, Designing regenerative cultures, Triarchy, Axminster.
 
Recommended reading materials
Mau. 2020. MC24. US. Phaidon Press
 
Other required resources