Unit Outline
KDA144
Visualising Design
Semester 2, 2026
Jose Vicente Garcia Cesar
School of Architecture and Design
Sciences and Engineering (Portfolio)
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B
Unit Coordinator
Jose Vicente Garcia Cesar
Email: Jose.Garcia@utas.edu.au
What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
 
In this unit you will be introduced to the essential principles and practices of effective visual communication. Students will develop both theoretical understanding and practical skills across key design areas including typesetting, hierarchy, and storytelling. The unit emphasises hands-on learning through relevant software while exploring the emerging role of AI co-intelligence in visual communication. Through project-based assessments, students will learn to create visually compelling communications that effectively convey messages across various media formats.
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1
Identify and describe the foundational elements of visual communication.
2
Implement appropriate design strategies to create effective visual communication using relevant software.
3
Critically assess the effectiveness of visual systems that contribute to cohesive messaging across multiple touchpoints.
4
Develop original visual communication projects that strategically integrate AI co-intelligence tools while maintaining design integrity and ethical considerations.
Alterations as a result of student feedback
 
 
 
Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
On Campus
Lecture (On Campus)
No Description
3
Weekly
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online or includes online activities, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline or MyLO, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 
How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
Design Sprints: part 1
Week 6
25 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 2:
Design Sprints: part 2
Week 12
30 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 3:
Style Guide
Week 12
45 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
 
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: Design Sprints: part 1
Task Description:
Culmination of weeks 1-5 sprint exercises.
Task Length:
 
Due Date:
Week 6
Weight:
25 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Demonstrates the ability to identify and describe key design elements and principles relevant to the sprint topic.
LO1
2
Shows proficiency in using relevant software for sprint.
LO2
3
Engages in critical reflection on the effectiveness of design choices.
LO3
4
Strategically integrates AI tools to enhance design processes and outcomes.
LO4
5
Maintains design integrity and considers ethical implications when using AI in visual communication.
LO4
 
Assessment Task 2: Design Sprints: part 2
Task Description:
Culmination of weeks 6-11 sprint exercises.
Task Length:
Multi-page PDF
Due Date:
Week 12
Weight:
30 %
 
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Demonstrates the ability to identify and describe key design elements and principles relevant to the sprint topic.
LO1
2
Shows proficiency in using relevant software for sprint
LO2
3
Engages in critical reflection on the effectiveness of design choices.
LO3
4
Strategically integrates AI tools to enhance design processes and outcomes.
LO4
5
Maintains design integrity and considers ethical implications when using AI in visual communication.
LO4
 
Assessment Task 3: Style Guide
Task Description:
You are tasked with designing a style guide for yourself, a brand, or project of your choice. The style guide should be visually engaging and effectively communicate the brand's visual identity through thoughtful design. Create a comprehensive style guide that demonstrates mastery of typesetting, hierarchy, identity, storytelling, and proficiency in Adobe InDesign. This style guide should serve as a reference for maintaining a consistent and cohesive visual identity across various media formats.
Task Length:
Multi-page PDF
Due Date:
Week 12
Weight:
45 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Visual appeal and professional presentation of the style guide.
LO2
2
Effective use of design principles and elements.
LO1, LO2
3
Accuracy and attention to detail in the layout and design.
LO2, LO3
4
Originality and creativity in the design and narrative.
LO2, LO3
5
Ability to articulate design decisions and their rationale.
LO1, LO2, LO3
 
 
 
How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
Academic progress review
The results for this unit may be included in a review of your academic progress. For information about progress reviews and what they mean for all students, see Academic Progress Review in the Student Portal.
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
Academic integrity
Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see
Important Guidelines & Support.
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 
Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.