Unit Outline
KDA106
Experience Design Systems
Semester 2, 2026
Jose Vicente Garcia Cesar
School of Architecture and Design
Sciences and Engineering (Portfolio)
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B
Unit Coordinator
Jose Vicente Garcia Cesar
Email: Jose.Garcia@utas.edu.au
 
What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
This introductory unit explores the principles and practices of Experience Design within structured environments. Working across digital and physical dimensions, this unit focuses on task-oriented experience design. Students will develop an understanding of how users navigate and interact with designed experiences, examining both functional aspects (way-finding systems, interface design, service touch-points) and emotional dimensions (user satisfaction, confidence, engagement). The unit introduces key concepts in perception theory to help students understand how users process information and make decisions within designed environments. Students will learn to apply service design methodologies to map user journeys and identify pain points. They will explore how heuristic principles guide intuitive interactions and develop skills with digital tools essential for prototyping and testing experience design solutions.
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1
Identify the fundamental principles of experience design.
2
Apply appropriate service design tools and methods.
3
Analyse how functional and emotional elements influence user interactions.
4
Create cohesive experience design solutions across touchpoints.
Alterations as a result of student feedback
 
 
 
Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
On Campus
Lecture (On Campus)
No Description
3
Weekly
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online or includes online activities, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline or MyLO, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 
How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
User Journey & Emotional Mapping Project
Week 4
25 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 2:
Interactive Prototype with Heuristic Evaluation
Week 8
35 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 3:
Experience Design Resolution
Week 12
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
 
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: User Journey & Emotional Mapping Project
Task Description:
Select an everyday experience and develop a comprehensive user journey map with emotional analysis.
Task Length:
 
Due Date:
Week 4
Weight:
25 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Conduct user research with at least 3 participants
LO2
2
Create a visual journey map identifying all touch-points.
LO1
3
Document emotional highs and lows throughout the journey.
LO1
4
Apply emotional design principles to analyse user engagement.
LO4
5
Identify key pain points and opportunities for improvement.
LO3
6
Present findings in a 5-minute presentation with visual aids
LO1
 
Assessment Task 2: Interactive Prototype with Heuristic Evaluation
Task Description:
Based on the pain points and emotional insights identified in Assessment 1, develop an interactive prototype that improves one aspect of the user journey.
Task Length:
 
Due Date:
Week 8
 
Weight:
35 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Apply appropriate service design tools to analyse the problem
LO2
2
Create wireframes/storyboards showing the proposed solution
LO2
3
Develop a functional interactive prototype (digital or physical)
LO4
4
Conduct a heuristic evaluation using Nielsen's principles
LO3
5
Document user testing with at least 3 participants
LO2
6
Submit a process document explaining design decisions and how emotional design principles were applied
LO1
 
Assessment Task 3: Experience Design Resolution
Task Description:
Develop a cohesive experience design solution that addresses a specific user need across multiple touchpoints.
Task Length:
 
Due Date:
Week 12
Weight:
40 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Identify a complex experience requiring both digital and physical interactions
LO1
2
Apply service design methodologies to map the current and proposed experience
LO2
3
Create prototypes demonstrating key interactions across touchpoints
LO4
4
Consider both functional elements (usability, efficiency) and emotional elements (engagement, satisfaction)
LO3
5
Present a comprehensive design solution with justification for design decisions
LO4
6
Include heuristic evaluation of the final solution
LO2
7
Include reflection on how principles of experience design were applied
LO1
 
 
 
How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
Academic progress review
The results for this unit may be included in a review of your academic progress. For information about progress reviews and what they mean for all students, see Academic Progress Review in the Student Portal.
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
Academic integrity
Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see
Important Guidelines & Support.
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 
Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.
 
 
 
Required Resources
Required reading materials
Burickson, A., Lupton, E., & Holeman, E. (2023). Experience Design: A Participatory Manifesto (1st ed.). Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.6535477
https://www.vlaanderen.be/publicaties/public-service-design-a-guide-for-the-application-of-service-design-in-public-organisations
 
Recommended reading materials
Suonheimo, M., Jones, P. H., & Lee, S.-H. (Eds.). (2025). Systemic service design. Routledge.
Uffelen, C. van. (2021). Designing orientation : signage, concepts & wayfinding systems (1st edition.). Braun.
Gibson, D. (2009). The wayfinding handbook : information design for public places (1st ed.). Princeton Architectural Press.
 
 
 
Other required resources