Unit Outline
KDA103
Design Studio: Elements
Semester 1, 2026
Vanessa Ward
School of Architecture and Design
Sciences and Engineering (Portfolio)
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B
Unit Coordinator
Vanessa Ward
Email: Vanessa.Ward@utas.edu.au
What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
 
This foundational unit introduces first-year Design students to the fundamental elements and principles of design, including color, shape, pattern, gestalt principles, and typography. Through a combination of theoretical knowledge, historical context, ethical considerations, and hands-on experimentation, students will develop essential skills in visual design, communication, and critique. The unit emphasises experimentation, reflection, and collaborative learning.
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1
Identify and define elements & principles of design.
2
Generate and refine design propositions through experimentation and reflection.
3
Apply fundamental skills in design to communicate and critique with and for peers.
4
Produce design artefacts in response to a directed brief.
Alterations as a result of student feedback
 
 
 
Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
On Campus
Lecture (On Campus)
No Description
3
Weekly
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online or includes online activities, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline or MyLO, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 
How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
Poster Design
See the MyLO site for the due date
20 %
LO1, LO2, LO4
Assessment Task 2:
Design Sprint Reflection
See the MyLO site for the due date
20 %
LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 3:
Design Sprints: part 2
See the MyLO site for the due date
35 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
Assessment Task 4:
Design Sprints: part 1
Week 6
25 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
 
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: Poster Design
Task Description:
Create a visually cohesive poster that integrates the work from all your sprints. This poster should demonstrate your understanding and application of the fundamental elements of design, including colour, shape, pattern, gestalt principles, and typography, while maintaining a consistent aesthetic throughout.
Task Length:
 
Due Date:
See the MyLO site for the due date
Weight:
20 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Effectively integrates elements from all sprints into a cohesive design.
LO1, LO2, LO4
2
Demonstrates proficiency in design software, ensures the poster is well-executed with attention to detail.
LO2
 
Assessment Task 2: Design Sprint Reflection
Task Description:
Guided reflection on learnings and sprints through series of questions. In this 300 word document you will critically reflect on and evaluate your own design process and each prototyping method.
Task Length:
 
Due Date:
See the MyLO site for the due date
Weight:
20 %
 
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Critically reflects on and evaluates their personal use of aesthetics in their design work, demonstrating critical thinking, self-awareness, and an understanding of design principles.
LO3
2
Apply professional visual communication strategies and techniques to written reflection.
LO4
 
Assessment Task 3: Design Sprints: part 2
Task Description:
Culmination of weeks 6-12 sprint exercises.
Task Length:
 
Due Date:
See the MyLO site for the due date
Weight:
35 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Clearly identify and define key elements and principles of design in Sprints.
LO1
2
Generate multiple design propositions through initial sketches and experiment with different approaches and techniques to refine design ideas.
LO2
3
Reflect on the effectiveness of each iteration and make informed adjustments.
LO3
4
Engage in constructive critique sessions with peers, providing and receiving feedback.
LO3
 
Assessment Task 4: Design Sprints: part 1
Task Description:
Culmination of weeks 1-5 design sprint exercises.
Task Length:
Multipage PDF
Due Date:
Week 6
Weight:
25 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Clearly identify and define key elements and principles of design in Sprints.
LO1
2
Generate multiple design propositions through initial sketches and experiment with different approaches and techniques to refine design ideas.
LO2
3
Reflect on the effectiveness of each iteration and make informed adjustments.
LO3
4
Engage in constructive critique sessions with peers, providing and receiving feedback.
LO2
5
Apply professional visual communication strategies and techniques to present sprint.
LO4
 
 
 
How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
Academic progress review
The results for this unit may be included in a review of your academic progress. For information about progress reviews and what they mean for all students, see Academic Progress Review in the Student Portal.
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
Academic integrity
Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see
Important Guidelines & Support.
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 
Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.