Unit Outline
FSX407
Research Tools, Techniques and Methods
Semester 1, 2026
Anthony Curran
Creative and Performing Arts
Arts and Society (Portfolio)
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B
Unit Coordinator
Anthony Curran
Email: tony.curran@utas.edu.au
What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
 
his unit provides an in-depth exploration of research methods and methodologies tailored for students in the Creative Arts and Media disciplines. It is designed to equip students with the necessary skills and knowledge to undertake rigorous research, whether through a written thesis or a creative / practice project accompanied by an exegesis. Students elect to focus on two of the three modules in this unit on Qualitative, Quantitative and Performative Methodologies to identify the strategies and methods to direct their inquiry.​  
This unit is a core unit for students from diverse backgrounds in art, music, theatre, and media, fostering an interdisciplinary awareness of undertaking research in the Creative Arts and Media. Students learn to review the benefits and implications of research in, on and through their fields, identifying potential risks in research methods and risk management strategies as well as the potential benefits of their research to participants, audiences, and communities to map out a viable project design for their Thesis and Creative Arts and Media Practice Project units.  
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1
Design a research project relevant to your discipline.
2
Evaluate and apply various research methods and methodologies relevant to Creative Arts and Media.
3
Evaluate and apply knowledge acquired through theoretical literature, current debates, and artefacts relevant to your projec
4
Analyse and interpret research governance and ethics concerns in the context of student-led research.
Requisites
REQUISITE TYPE
REQUISITES
Co-requisite
FSX404
Alterations as a result of student feedback
 
 
 
Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
On Campus
Studio
No Description
3
Weekly
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online or includes online activities, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline or MyLO, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 
How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
Literature review
See the MyLO site for the due date
30 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 2:
Ethics Position Paper
Week 4
20 %
LO1, LO2, LO4
Assessment Task 3:
Methods Position Paper
Week 13
50 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
 
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: Literature review
Task Description:
Produce a literature review (20 minute presentation with fully referenced script approx. 2000 words) and/or audit of contextual works including images, summarising key sources and outlining their relevance to your project.
Task Length:
20min presentation
Due Date:
See the MyLO site for the due date
Weight:
30 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Summarise relevant and authoritative sources accurately and succinctly
LO2, LO3
2
Situate your project within fields of practice and research
LO1, LO4
3
Write substantiated arguments which are appropriately referenced.
LO1
 
Assessment Task 2: Ethics Position Paper
Task Description:
Consider the ethical implications of your research to produce a detailed paper outlining the ethical considerations and approvals required for the research.

Identify ethical issues and describe how you will address them.

Your discipline representative will advise if your project requires approval from the University Ethics Committee. Should this be the case, this task will form the basis for your ethics application.
Task Length:
1500-2000 words
Due Date:
Week 4
Weight:
20 %
 
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Analyse the ethical issues raised in creative arts and media research and the contexts in which they arise
LO1, LO2
2
Apply knowledge of ethics standards, governance and processes to your research project
LO4
3
Write about ethical issues and the context of your project.
LO1
 
Assessment Task 3: Methods Position Paper
Task Description:
Produce an expanded proposal that positions the methods, strategies and methodologies of your research project.
Task Length:
2000 words
Due Date:
Week 13
Weight:
50 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Identify and evaluate appropriate sources to inform your project research methods, strategies and methodologies.
LO2, LO3
2
Define research focus and project boundaries to construct a feasible project
LO1, LO4
3
Write substantiated arguments which are appropriately referenced
LO3
 
 
 
How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
Academic progress review
The results for this unit may be included in a review of your academic progress. For information about progress reviews and what they mean for all students, see Academic Progress Review in the Student Portal.
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
Academic integrity
Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see
Important Guidelines & Support.
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 
Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.