Unit Outline
EMT611
Primary English Curriculum and Pedagogy
Semester 1, 2026
Lisa Davies
Faculty of Education
Arts and Society (Portfolio)
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B
Unit Coordinator
Lisa Davies
Email: lisa.davies@utas.edu.au
 
What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
Children encounter a wide range of texts in their lives. They are expected to read, interpret, and create these texts across learning areas. This unit emphasises explicit instruction in reading and writing, with a focus on genre, grammar, and curriculum alignment. Students explore how socio-cultural contexts shape meaning, and how texts vary in field, tenor, and mode. Evidence-based practices are used to support literacy teaching, learning, and assessment. Written genres such as recounts, explanations, reports, and persuasive texts are taught across subjects. The unit also investigates children’s literature, with a deep study of picture books to support multimodal comprehension and critical literacy. Students learn to teach reading and writing with clarity, confidence, and disciplinary knowledge.
 
 
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1
Apply your theoretical knowledge of the English discipline to interpret texts and their potential for teaching
2
Apply the skills of textual analysis to (a) children’s writing samples; and (b) children’s literature
3
Transform your knowledge of theory and pedagogies to design critical and creative classroom experiences
Requisites
REQUISITE TYPE
REQUISITES
Pre-requisite
EMT511
Alterations as a result of student feedback
 
 
 
Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
Online
Lecture (Online)
Pre-recorded lecture/s
1
Weekly
Tutorial (Online)
Workshops commencing in Week 2
2
Weekly
Independent Learning
8 hours of study per week, including time spent reading, or viewing resources provided to you, searching for additional information/resources necessary for the competition of assessment tasks and other activities, and participating in weekly tasks.
8
Weekly
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online or includes online activities, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline or MyLO, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 
How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
Teaching Writing through text Analysis
Week 4
20 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
Assessment Task 2:
Writing with Subject Knowledge: Reading to Understand, Writing to Express
Week 8
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
Assessment Task 3:
Reading, Viewing, Designing: Multimodal Literacy
Week 12
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
 
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: Teaching Writing through text Analysis
Task Description:
Select one of the writing samples from the AT1 information page on MyLO to analyse. Your analysis should demonstrate subject matter expertise in literacy by identifying student learning needs and selecting and explaining explicit teaching strategies for writing in a specific learning area (other than English).

Part 1: Analysis (600 words) · Analyse the writing sample to identify key literacy strengths and challenges. Focus on genre and grammatical features relevant to the subject area and interpret how these features shape meaning. Use your analysis to determine the student’s learning needs.

Part 2: Summary (200 words) Summarise your findings and propose explicit teaching strategies for writing that address the identified learning needs. Your strategies should reflect effective literacy teaching within the context of the selected subject area, demonstrating how writing can be explicitly taught to support disciplinary learning.
Completion of this Assessment Task relates to Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST) 5.1, 5.4
Task Length:
800 words
Due Date:
Week 4
Weight:
20 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Analyses text features of written genres: imaginative, informative and persuasive.
LO1, LO2
2
Analyses grammatical features: field, tenor, mode, processes, participants, circumstances
LO1, LO2
3
Synthesises analysis to identify learning needs, and designs explicit teaching strategies for writing, explaining pedagogical choices.
LO2, LO3
 
Assessment Task 2: Writing with Subject Knowledge: Reading to Understand, Writing to Express
Task Description:
This task builds on AT1: you may use the same writing sample that you analysed in AT1.

Part 1: Analysis (500 words) Analyse the grammatical features relevant to the text type and subject area.

Part 2: Detailed Lesson and Resource (1100 words) Design a learning experience that explicitly teaches writing in a subject area other than English, focused on the grammatical feature selected in Part 1. Your response must include curriculum alignment, theoretical justification, and a brief (100-word) reflective statement on your use of digital tools, including AI.
Note: The reflective statement is included within the 1100-word limit.

Completion of this Assessment Task relates to Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST) 2.1, 2.3, 2.5, 3.3
Task Length:
1600 words
Due Date:
Week 8
Weight:
40 %
 
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Analyses grammatical features in a student writing sample from a specific subject area.
LO2
2
Designs a learning experience for explicit teaching of writing, demonstrating pedagogical reasoning and contextual responsiveness. Note: The subject area must be a discipline other than English (e.g. Science, HASS, HPE, the Arts)
LO1, LO3
3
Designs and justifies a resource for explicitly teaching a written grammatical feature. Note: The subject area must be a discipline other than English (e.g. Science, HASS, HPE, the Arts)
LO3
 
Assessment Task 3: Reading, Viewing, Designing: Multimodal Literacy
Task Description:
Design a unit of work for Years 2–6 that explicitly teaches reading comprehension and critical literacy through the close study of an Australian picturebook. You will select one of the picturebooks listed on the AT3 Information page on MyLo. Your unit design must demonstrate subject matter expertise in literacy by explicitly teaching reading strategies and multimodal comprehension. It must also incorporate evidence-based assessment practices to evaluate student progress, adjust instruction, and support learning.

Part 1: Theoretical Analysis (500 words) Analyse the picturebook using relevant theory. Your analysis should explore genre, context, visual and literary/textual features, and how the text supports reading comprehension and critical literacy.

Part 2: Overview of Unit and Lessons (1100 words) Outline the structure of a ten-lesson unit and design four detailed lessons that explicitly teach reading comprehension through genre, context, visual features, and literary/textual features. Each lesson must include evidence-based strategies for teaching reading and assessing student progress, demonstrating how assessment is used to evaluate comprehension, adjust instruction, and support learning. You must also include a short reflective commentary (approx. 200 words included within the 1100-word limit) that justifies your design decisions. This commentary should:

· Draw on research about effective teaching practices from this unit.
· Explain how your unit and lesson design reflect effective teaching practices in literacy and assessment.
· Demonstrate your understanding of how theory informs practice.

Completion of this Assessment Task relates to Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST) 2.1, 2.2, 2.5, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5
Task Length:
1600 words
Due Date:
Week 12
Weight:
40 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Analyses a picturebook using theory to support reading comprehension and critical literacy
LO1, LO2
2
Designs a unit of work that explicitly teaches reading comprehension and critical literacy
LO3
3
Designs lessons that explicitly teach reading through genre, context, visual and literary/textual features.
LO1, LO3
4
Applies evidence-based assessment practices to evaluate and support students’ comprehension of visual and multimodal texts
LO3
 
 
 
How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
Academic progress review
The results for this unit may be included in a review of your academic progress. For information about progress reviews and what they mean for all students, see Academic Progress Review in the Student Portal.
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
Academic integrity
Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see
Important Guidelines & Support.
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 
Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.
 
 
 
Required Resources
Required reading materials
Derewianka, B. & Jones, P. (2016). Teaching language in context (2nd edn.). Oxford University Press.
Lewis, D. (2001).
Reading contemporary picturebooks: Picturing Text. Routledge.
Reading Lists provide direct access to all material on unit reading lists in one place. This includes eReadings and items in Reserve. 
 
Recommended reading materials
Duncan, D. (2009). Teaching children’s literature: Making stories work in the classroom. Routledge.
Fellowes, J. & Oakley, G. (2014).
Language, literacy and early childhood education. (2nd ed.). Oxford.
Gamble, N. (2019).
Exploring children’s literature (4th edn). Sage.
Humphrey, S., Droga, S. & Feez, S. (2012).
Grammar and meaning. Primary English Teaching Association of Australia.
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006).
Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
Lewis, D. (2001).
Reading contemporary picturebooks: Picturing text. Routledge.
Nodelman, P., & Reimer, M. (2002).
The pleasures of children’s literature. Allyn & Bacon.
Rossbridge, J. & Ruston, K. (2015).
Put it in writing: Context, text and language. PETAA.
Rudd, D. (ed). (2010).
The Routledge companion to children’s literature. Routledge.
Russell, D. L. (2015).
Literature for children: A short introduction (8th ed.). Sage.
 
Other required resources
You will need to purchase or access one of the picturebooks indicated as suitable for AT3