| | | | | | | CRITERION # | CRITERION | MEASURES INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOME(S) | | | | 1 | Analyses grammatical features in a student writing sample from a specific subject area. | LO2 | 2 | Designs a learning experience for explicit teaching of writing, demonstrating pedagogical reasoning and contextual responsiveness. Note: The subject area must be a discipline other than English (e.g. Science, HASS, HPE, the Arts) | LO1, LO3 | 3 | Designs and justifies a resource for explicitly teaching a written grammatical feature. Note: The subject area must be a discipline other than English (e.g. Science, HASS, HPE, the Arts) | LO3 |
|
| | | Assessment Task 3: Reading, Viewing, Designing: Multimodal Literacy | Task Description: | Design a unit of work for Years 2–6 that explicitly teaches reading comprehension and critical literacy through the close study of an Australian picturebook. You will select one of the picturebooks listed on the AT3 Information page on MyLo. Your unit design must demonstrate subject matter expertise in literacy by explicitly teaching reading strategies and multimodal comprehension. It must also incorporate evidence-based assessment practices to evaluate student progress, adjust instruction, and support learning.
Part 1: Theoretical Analysis (500 words) Analyse the picturebook using relevant theory. Your analysis should explore genre, context, visual and literary/textual features, and how the text supports reading comprehension and critical literacy.
Part 2: Overview of Unit and Lessons (1100 words) Outline the structure of a ten-lesson unit and design four detailed lessons that explicitly teach reading comprehension through genre, context, visual features, and literary/textual features. Each lesson must include evidence-based strategies for teaching reading and assessing student progress, demonstrating how assessment is used to evaluate comprehension, adjust instruction, and support learning. You must also include a short reflective commentary (approx. 200 words included within the 1100-word limit) that justifies your design decisions. This commentary should:
· Draw on research about effective teaching practices from this unit. · Explain how your unit and lesson design reflect effective teaching practices in literacy and assessment. · Demonstrate your understanding of how theory informs practice.
Completion of this Assessment Task relates to Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST) 2.1, 2.2, 2.5, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5 | Task Length: | | Due Date: | Week 12 | Weight: | 40 % | | | CRITERION # | CRITERION | MEASURES INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOME(S) | | | | 1 | Analyses a picturebook using theory to support reading comprehension and critical literacy | LO1, LO2 | 2 | Designs a unit of work that explicitly teaches reading comprehension and critical literacy | LO3 | 3 |
Designs lessons that explicitly teach reading through genre, context, visual and literary/textual features. | LO1, LO3 | 4 | Applies evidence-based assessment practices to evaluate and support students’ comprehension of visual and multimodal texts | LO3 |
|
| | |
| | | | | | | |
|
| |
| |