| | | | | | | CRITERION # | CRITERION | MEASURES INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOME(S) | | | | 1 | Applies English discipline and curriculum knowledge to design a lesson plan that clearly articulates purposeful learning goals and incorporates relevant theory and evidence-based practice. | LO1, LO2, LO3 | 2 | Designs explicit, evidence-based instruction in reading or writing that includes clear learning intentions, modelling, guided practice, scaffolding, and opportunities for independent application | LO1, LO2, LO5 | 3 |
Plans and sequences content and tasks progressively to build challenge and support retention, incorporating spacing and retrieval practice, and demonstrating clear alignment to learning goals | LO2, LO3 | 4 | Selects and justifies research-informed assessment practices that evaluate student progress, inform instructional adjustments, provide targeted feedback, and support learning. | LO1, LO5 | 5 | Communicates and justifies pedagogical decisions clearly, using relevant research and accurate scholarly referencing to support all claims and instructional choices
| LO4 |
|
| | | Assessment Task 3: Designing a Senior Secondary English Learning Sequence | Task Description: | This task requires you to design a learning sequence (8–12 lessons) for Year 11 or 12, using the senior secondary pre-tertiary English or Literature curriculum. Select a prescribed text and design your sequence for a specific course module, addressing the relevant work or assessment requirements. Your submission will include:
· Part 1: A sequenced unit plan with explicit, research-informed teaching and assessment strategies for reading and writing, original resources, and a teacher toolkit to support differentiation and challenge. Your sequence must demonstrate effective planning and sequencing of content and tasks so that they become increasingly challenging and must incorporate spacing and retrieval practice. Part 2: A written justification and reflection, demonstrating alignment with relevant senior secondary English curriculum and assessment criteria, evidence-based practice, and critical evaluation of your design.
Completion of this Assessment Task relates to Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST)2.1,2.3, 2.4 | Task Length: | | Due Date: | Week 12 | Weight: | 40 % | | | CRITERION # | CRITERION | MEASURES INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOME(S) | | | | 1 | Effectively plans, sequences, and scaffolds learning, demonstrating skill in organizing content and tasks that progressively challenge students, incorporating spacing and retrieval practice | LO2, LO3 | 2 | Effectively applies English discipline, theoretical, pedagogical, and curriculum knowledge to inform lesson design and pedagogical decisions, clearly aligned with course content and assessment criteria | LO1, LO2, LO3 | 3 | Justifies explicit, research-based teaching and assessment strategies for reading and/or writing, effectively aligned with course content, assessment criteria, and informed by relevant theory and pedagogical practice | LO1, LO2, LO3 | 4 | Develops and annotates original, research-informed resources and a teacher toolkit that effectively support differentiation, challenge, and retrieval practice | LO3, LO5 | 5 | Communicates clearly using academic writing conventions, demonstrating accurate and consistent scholarly referencing | LO4 |
|
| | |
| | | | | | | |
|
| |
| |