Unit Outline
EMT520
Personal and Professional Numeracy
Semester 1, 2026
Osman Kasimu
Faculty of Education
Arts and Society (Portfolio)
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B
Unit Coordinator
Osman Kasimu
Email: osman.kasimu@utas.edu.au
 
What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
This unit is the foundation mathematics and numeracy unit for secondary students in the Master of Teaching. It provides an opportunity to reflect upon and to develop understanding of concepts that are central to mathematics curricula; to consider the cross-disciplinary implications and opportunities afforded by these topics; and to develop quantitative literacy understandings that will enable students to be informed professionals. Foci of the unit include the development of a critical orientation to presentation of numeracy concepts in the media, and an appreciation of the importance of quantitative understandings to the personal and professional lives of all teachers.
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1
apply knowledge and understanding of mathematical concepts underpinning critical numeracy.
2
identify and evaluate upon critical numeracy in media reports and in other contexts relevant to different curriculum areas.
3
complete, analyse and reflect upon an educational numeracy activity.
4
analyse quantitative knowledge involved in personal and professional decision making.
5
use literacy skills to present evidence, including relevant literature, to support arguments about issues related to personal and professional numeracy.
Requisites
REQUISITE TYPE
REQUISITES
Concurrent Pre-requisite
EMT502
Alterations as a result of student feedback
 
 
 
Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
On Campus
Lecture (Online)
No Description
1
Weekly
Tutorial
Tutorial workshop per timetable
2
Weekly
Online
Independent Learning
Lectures, activities, participation in discussion boards
7
Weekly
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online or includes online activities, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline or MyLO, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 
How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
Beliefs about Mathematics
Week 3
15 %
LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 2:
Critical numeracy and mathematical reasoning in social and academic contexts
Week 7
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO4
Assessment Task 3:
Numeracy in Another Discipline
Week 12
45 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5
 
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: Beliefs about Mathematics
Task Description:
There are two parts in the Assessment Task 1. You must complete both Part 1 and Part 2.

Part 1: In the content of week 1, you were asked to consider some statements about people’s beliefs about mathematics. Choose one of these statements and describe arguments for and against this statement. Answer this question even if you have disagreed with the statement you are discussing.
Part 2:
Using insights from Torrijos-Muelas et al. (2021), write a reflective piece exploring your understanding of the neuromyth of 'left brain–right brain dominance' in mathematics education. Consider how the persistence of this misconception might influence or potentially hinder the professional practice of teachers and preservice teachers.

Completion of this Assessment Task relates to Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST) 2.1
Task Length:
600 words
Due Date:
Week 3
Weight:
15 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Demonstrate analytic skills to support arguments about issues relating to professional numeracy
LO3
2
Demonstrate professional communication skills to support arguments about issues relating to professional numeracy
LO4
 
Assessment Task 2: Critical numeracy and mathematical reasoning in social and academic contexts
Task Description:
Part 1
Use the critical numeracy framework to critique the two short media articles that you will find under Content, Resources for Assessment 2.
For each of the articles:
• Describe and explain the mathematical terminology in the article that the reader would have to know to understand the article. Describe this terminology within the context of the article with appropriate examples. For example, if the article includes percentages, you will need to describe what a percentage is. Do not include words such as ‘before’ or ‘after’ but stick to what would be considered to be mathematical terms. If in doubt, place a question on the Assignment 2 discussion board.
• Describe the major conclusion(s) of the article including the reasoning given for this/these conclusion(s). For example, the article might suggest that we should all avoid drinking cow’s milk because the people in their study all suffered from colds.
• Explain whether or not you think the evidence provided in the article is convincing. Do not go and find the original sources of the articles. What other information do you think needs to be included before you can be sure that the conclusion(s) is/are valid? Explain your reasoning. For example, you may wish to know how many people were in the study. [1500 words to here]
Part 2
• Go to the Australian Curriculum V.9 for your specialisation. Go to General Capabilities and then Numeracy and read what this document says about the numeracy requirements in your specialisation. How prepared do you feel to teach the numeracy demands for your specialisation? Which areas do you need to work on so that you can improve learning opportunities for your students? [500 words]

Completion of this Assessment Task relates to Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST) 2.5, 6.1
Task Length:
1600 words
Due Date:
Week 7
Weight:
40 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
 
1
Demonstrate knowledge of the mathematics used in the selected articles.
LO1
2
Critically analyse the argument and evidence used in the selected articles.
LO2
3
Reflect on personal numeracy knowledge.
LO2
4
Demonstrate professional communication skills including the correct use of APA referencing
LO4
 
Assessment Task 3: Numeracy in Another Discipline
Task Description:
This assignment is in two parts. This assignment is suitable for your portfolio.
Part 1
Choose an explicit teaching activity from a learning area other than mathematics but incorporates a numeracy principle/concept. If you are in the VET sector you may like to choose something from your area of expertise.
Using Prezi or PowerPoint, prepare a talk that would be suitable for an audience of fellow teachers, describing the activity. Provide the script and slides for your proposed talk (you will not actually give the talk) making sure that you include:

A description of the explicit teaching activity including the target year level/curriculum area.
• A detailed explanation of the mathematics/numeracy involved.
• How the activity supports the development of fluency within one or more of the six mathematical strands: Number, Algebra, Measurement, Geometry, Statistics and Probability.
• Justify the integration of numeracy in this activity, how it enhances students' understanding of the non-mathematical subject area for which the activity was designed.
[1200 words to here]*

Make sure you include all references presented in APA style.
Part 2
Between Week 3 and Week 12, you were asked to contribute weekly discussions featuring a challenging problem-solving activity from a non-mathematics curriculum area, each requiring the integration of the numeracy concept explored that week. Drawing on these discussion boards, select three ideas you found particularly useful. Reflect on why these ideas resonated with you and explain how you would incorporate them into your classroom practice, either during your teaching placement or throughout your teaching career. [800 words]
Presentation instructions:
• Prezi users: Submit the script in a Word document with a link to the Prezi slides. Make sure you identify the points in the script where the slides need to change.

*NB: Only the words in the script are included in the word count, not the words in the slides.

Completion of this Assessment Task relates to Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST) 2.1, 2.5, 3.5
Task Length:
1000 + 800 words
Due Date:
Week 12
Weight:
45 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Demonstrate understanding of the identified mathematical ideas
LO1, LO5
2
Reflect on personal numeracy
LO2
3
Justify the choice of explicit teaching activity to build of fluency, understanding, problem solving and reasoning.
LO3
4
Demonstrate professional communication skills illustrated by the use of PowerPoint or Prezi, and academic writing and referencing
LO4
 
 
 
How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
Academic progress review
The results for this unit may be included in a review of your academic progress. For information about progress reviews and what they mean for all students, see Academic Progress Review in the Student Portal.
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
Academic integrity
Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see
Important Guidelines & Support.
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 
Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.
 
 
 
Required Resources
Required reading materials
Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers. (1998). Policy on numeracy education in schools. https://primarystandards.aamt.edu.au/About-AAMT/Position-statements/Numeracy-education
Blastland, M., & Dilnot, A. (2010). The Tiger That Isn’t : Seeing Through a World of Numbers. Profile Books Ltd. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.utas.edu.au/lib/utas/detail.action?docID=578933
Torrijos-Muelas, M., González-Víllora, S., & Bodoque-Osma, A. R. (2021). The persistence of neuromyths in educational settings: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 591923. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591923
Steen, L. A. (2007). Every teacher is a teacher of mathematics. Every Teacher Is a Teacher of Mathematics.7(5), 16–20. http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.utas.edu.au/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=507947985&site=ehost-live
 
Recommended reading materials
Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematics education in its cultural context. Educational Studies
in Mathematics, 19
(2), 179–191. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3482573
Clarke, D. M. (2005). Written algorithms in the primary years : undoing the ‘good’ work? In A. A. of M. T. (AAMT) Conference (20th : 2005 : Sydney NSW), Making mathematics vital : proceedings of the twentieth Biennial Conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers, University of Technology, Sydney, 17-20 January 2005. - Trove (pp. 93–98). https://content.talisaspire.com/utas/bundles/5f73b1b147e6430f11124b24
Forgasz, H. J., Leder, G., & Hall, J. (2017). Numeracy across the curriculum in Australian schools: Teacher education students’ and practising teachers’ views and understandings of numeracy. Numeracy, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-
4660.10.2.2
Geiger, V., Bennison, A., & Roberts, A. (2015). Numeracy teaching across the curriculum in Queensland: Resources for teachers. The University of Queensland. https://cdn.qct.edu.au/pdf/Numeracy_Teaching_Across_Curriculum_QLD.pdf
Getnet, S., Baker, B., Fielding, A., Muir, T., & Adeniji, K. (2024). Numeracy across the Australian Curriculum: Opportunities from F to 6. In J. Višňovská, E. Ross, & S. Getenet (Eds.), Surfing the waves of mathematics education: Proceedings of the 46th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 247–254). MERGA. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED661017
Goos, M., Geiger, V., Dole, S., Forgasz, H., & Bennison, A. (2019). Numeracy across the curriculum: Research-based strategies for enhancing teaching and learning.Allen & Unwin. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003116585
Griffin, M. (2012). Parents kids maths = trouble. The Age (Melbourne, Australia)October 6, 19–19. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A304445996/AONE?u=utas1&sid=AONE&xid=78bf4524
Hilton, A., & Hilton, G. (2021). Chapter 3: The Hindu–Arabic number system. In Making sense of number: Improving personal numeracy (pp. 33–49). Cambridge University Press.
Nielsen, J. A., Zielinski, B. A., Ferguson, M. A., Lainhart, J. E., & Anderson, J. S. (2013). An evaluation of the left-brain vs. right-brain hypothesis with resting-state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e71275.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071275
Northcote, M., & McIntosh, A. (1999). What Mathematics Do Adults Really Do in Everyday Life? Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 4(1), 19–21. https://search-informit-com-au.ezproxy.utas.edu.au/documentSummary;dn=461662849887452;res=IELHSS
Siemon, D., Beswick, K., Brady, K., Clark, J., Faragher, R., & Warren, E. (2011). Teaching mathematics: Foundations to middle years. Oxford University Press.
 
Other required resources
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2022). Australian Curriculum (Version 9.0). https://v9.australiancurriculum.edu.au