Unit Outline
EDU108
Human Development and Learning
Semester 2, 2026
David Shorter
Faculty of Education
Arts and Society (Portfolio)
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B
Unit Coordinator
David Shorter
Email: david.shorter@utas.edu.au
 
What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
This unit explores the application of cognitive science to teaching and learning in contemporary school settings. It examines how research on memory, attention, and cognitive load informs effective classroom practice. Learners engage with strategies such as retrieval practice, spaced repetition, and dual coding to enhance knowledge retention and transfer. The unit highlights the role of prior knowledge in shaping new learning and the importance of scaffolding to support diverse student needs.
Teachers will investigate how metacognition empowers students to monitor and regulate their own learning. A focus on working memory limitations guides discussion of instructional design, clarity, and reducing extraneous load. Learners also consider how motivation, feedback, and formative assessment interact with cognitive processes in school contexts. The unit integrates digital and multimodal tools while critically evaluating their impact on cognition. Case studies from primary and secondary classrooms illustrate practical applications of theory. By the end, participants will connect cognitive science research with evidence-based pedagogy to improve outcomes for all learners.
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1
Analyse the physical, intellectual development, social, emotional, moral, and spiritual development of students and explain how this may affect learning.
2
Synthesise research into how students learn and explain the implications for teaching.
3
Communicate in writing for an academic audience.
Alterations as a result of student feedback
 
 
 
Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
On Campus
Tutorial
No Description
2
Weekly
Online
Lecture (Online)
No Description
1
Weekly
Tutorial (Online)
No Description
2
Weekly
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online or includes online activities, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline or MyLO, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 
How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
Reflective analysis of theories and teaching practice (CC1.1)
Week 4
20 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
Assessment Task 2:
Teaching Strategy Portfolio (CC1.3)
Week 8
35 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
Assessment Task 3:
Micro-Teaching Demonstration (CC1.2)
Week 11
45 %
LO1
 
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: Reflective analysis of theories and teaching practice (CC1.1)
Task Description:
Students will write an 800-word reflective analysis that critically examines how insights from the first three modules can inform effective teaching practices in a diverse classroom. The analysis must incorporate:

Reflect on the principles of good teaching and the role of educational psychology in understanding and improving teaching practices using cognitive science.

Explore the impact of cultural diversity and community influences, using Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological model, and explain how understanding attachment and family relationships enhances engagement and learning.

Evaluate how behavioural theories (e.g., classical and operant conditioning, applied behaviour analysis) can be applied to create inclusive and effective classroom environments.
Task Length:
800 words
Due Date:
Week 4
Weight:
20 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Analyse and apply key theories presented in the first two modules
LO1
2
Critically evaluate teaching strategies such as culturally responsive teaching or others
LO2
3
Investigate how specific theories can inform practice in classrooms.
LO2
4
Communication of ideas through appropriate use of scholarly writing conventions and information literacy skills
LO3
 
Assessment Task 2: Teaching Strategy Portfolio (CC1.3)
Task Description:
Students will curate a portfolio showcasing teaching strategies designed for diverse learners, with a focus on research evidence informed learning approaches.

The portfolio should include:

A rationale where relevant theories are connected to teaching strategies to

Sample teaching activities for a chosen subject or age group.

Reflections on how these strategies might cater to student diversity and shows an awareness of location.
Task Length:
1500 words
Due Date:
Week 8
Weight:
35 %
 
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Justify teaching strategies with theoretical and research-based rationale
LO2
2
Critical analysis of relevant theories of human development and the connection to teaching strategies
LO1
3
Articulation of connections between student diversity and classroom teaching practice
LO1
4
Communicate ideas using academic conventions
LO3
 
Assessment Task 3: Micro-Teaching Demonstration (CC1.2)
Task Description:
Students will record a 5-minute micro-teaching session (checking for understanding) where they apply embodied and multimodal learning strategies to teach a concept. The session must address a specific behavioural or learning need within the teaching context. They must submit the video along with a 500-word rationale explaining:

Critically reflect and consideration of why teaching practices must adapt as a student’s familiarity with the knowledge of a subject increases, including when to move from scaffolded practice to independent practice, and why this is important.

Demonstrate application of effective teaching practices which reduce cognitive overload, including explicit instruction, scaffolding.

Ensure the lesson is free of common neuromyths that are related to education.
Task Length:
1800 equivalent
Due Date:
Week 11
Weight:
45 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Critically reflect on theory and professional practice
LO1
2
Demonstrate application of the links between theory and practice in a micro-teaching session
LO1
3
Justify and interpret teaching strategies which can support learning in the selected context.
LO1
 
 
 
How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
Academic progress review
The results for this unit may be included in a review of your academic progress. For information about progress reviews and what they mean for all students, see Academic Progress Review in the Student Portal.
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
Academic integrity
Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see
Important Guidelines & Support.
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 
Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.
 
 
 
Required Resources
Required reading materials
 
 
 
Recommended reading materials
 Australian Education Research Organisation. (2023), How Students Learn Best: An Overview of the Learning Process and the Most Effective Teaching Practices, 
Chinnapan, M., & Chandler, P. (2010). Managing Cognitive Load in the mathematics classroom. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 66(1), 5-11. 
Clark, R. E., Kirschner, P. A., & Sweller, J. (2012). Putting students on the path to learning: The case for fully guided instruction. American educator, 36(1), 6-11.  
Geary, D. C. (2008). An evolutionarily informed education science. Educational psychologist, 43(4), 179-195. 
Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why unguided learning does not work: An analysis of the failure of discovery learning, problem-based learning, experiential learning and inquiry-based learning. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. 
Long, B. (2023). In a nutshell. It all makes sense- the importance of brain education. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 28(1), 39-40. 
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37-76). Academic Press. 
 
Other required resources