Unit Outline
EAL112
Foundations of Applied Learning
Semester 2, 2026
Timothy Atkins
Faculty of Education
Arts and Society (Portfolio)
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B
Unit Coordinator
Timothy Atkins
Email: Timothy.Atkins@utas.edu.au
 
What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
 
Applied learning is an approach that contextualises knowledge and skills in meaningful, real‑world situations to empower and motivate students to develop the capabilities needed for employment, further education, and active participation in their communities. Central to this approach is the creation of partnerships and connections between students, teachers, and individuals or organisations outside traditional learning environments. Applied learning also recognises that multiple pathways can lead to desired learning goals and values the diverse ways students think, act, and engage. This unit will support you to identify effective applied teaching and learning strategies, while exploring the theoretical foundations and ways of thinking, being, and doing that underpin successful applied learning. You will then have the opportunity to apply these skills through a work‑integrated learning (WIL) activity that includes a combination of direct supervision, guided observation, and participation in a range of teaching and support activities. This structured experience is designed to help you meaningfully connect applied learning theory with practice and build confidence in applying these approaches within real‑world educational settings.
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1
Analyse and apply the theoretical foundations of applied learning in practice
2
Apply the principles of applied learning to learning and teaching in own discipline area.
3
Evaluate applied learning within different educational settings
4
Justify professional practice against standards and theoretical literature
Alterations as a result of student feedback
 
 
 
Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
Online
Independent Learning
Engaging in weekly content
2
Weekly
Tutorial (Online)
Collegial discussions and activities
2
Weekly
Independent Learning
Engaging with readings, preparation of assessment tasks, and work integrated learning
6
Weekly
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online or includes online activities, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline or MyLO, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 
How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
Applied Learning Theory
Week 9
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 2:
Applied Learning Blog
Week 12
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 3:
Supervised Teaching 1
Week 13
0 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 4:
Reflective Statement
Week 13
20 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
 
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: Applied Learning Theory
Task Description:
For this task, you will prepare and deliver a short (10-12 min) presentation to a small group of people, who may be your teaching
peers or other colleagues, or friends who are in some way involved in education. In this presentation you will give an overview of applied learning theory and practice, linking it to any other models of teaching or learning that may exist in your educational institution (such as a mission statement in an RTO, the Australian Teacher professional Standards, and/or a school teaching philosophy statement), and showing how it applies in your own practice.
Task Length:
1500 words
Due Date:
Week 9
Weight:
40 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Examine applied learning pedagogies to own teaching context (30%)
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
2
Explore the relationship between educational theory, professional standards, and teaching approaches (30%)
LO1, LO4
3
Reflect on personal professional practice and learning (30%)
LO1, LO3
4
Apply professional, ethical, and academic communication and research skills (10%)
LO4
 
Assessment Task 2: Applied Learning Blog
Task Description:
In this task, you will draw on applied learning principles, unit readings, MyLO discussions, professional standards, and your work‑integrated learning (WIL) experience to examine a range of planning and delivery approaches within your teaching context. You will identify strategies to modify or enhance your individual and/or collective practices to improve student engagement and learning.
During your 10 hours of WIL, you will maintain a personal reflective journal in the form of a blog. Your blog may be presented in written, audio, video formats, or a combination of these. Because your involvement during the WIL activity may vary, your reflective journal should be treated as a ‘live’ document, with ongoing entries made across the full duration of the WIL experience.
Task Length:
1500 words equivalent
Due Date:
Week 12
Weight:
40 %
 
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Evaluate and reflect on individual professional practice (30%)
LO1, LO2, LO3
2
Justify own and other’s approaches to the planning and delivery of applied learning (30%)
LO1, LO2, LO4
3
Analyse strategies for the improvement of student engagement and learning (30%)
LO1, LO2, LO3
4
Justify professional practice against applied learning principles and theoretical literature (20%)
LO4
 
Assessment Task 3: Supervised Teaching 1
Task Description:
Supervised Teaching 1, is a work integrated learning activity that includes 10 hours of supervised teaching across a range of tasks and responsibilities supporting your growth and confidence as a teacher.

Working under supervision gives you structured, real-world opportunities to develop your teaching skills in authentic learning environments. In this activity you will apply and critically evaluate applied learning strategies in a range of learning and teaching contexts with the benefit of regular formative feedback from experienced educators.

The 10 hours of Supervised Teaching contribute to the 50 hours required across the course, which play an important role in the refinement of your teaching as well as progression in the workplace.
Task Length:
10 hours
Due Date:
Week 13
Weight:
0 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Deliver learning in own discipline area
LO2
2
Deliver learning activities that respond directly to learner need
LO2, LO3, LO4
3
Use traditional and digital media for professional communication
LO2
4
Justify professional, practice against standards and theoretical literature
LO4
5
Participate in collaborative peer review
LO1, LO2, LO3
 
Assessment Task 4: Reflective Statement
Task Description:
This task requires you to assemble a reflective statement. This statement should extend on your blog submission to demonstrate your learning from the experience.
Task Length:
1000 words
Due Date:
Week 13
Weight:
20 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Reflect on professional practice and continuing learning needs
LO2, LO3, LO4
2
Evaluate individual professional performance
LO1, LO2, LO3
3
Reflect on own learning with application of the feedback, standards, and theoretical literature
LO1, LO2, LO4
 
 
 
How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
Academic progress review
The results for this unit may be included in a review of your academic progress. For information about progress reviews and what they mean for all students, see Academic Progress Review in the Student Portal.
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
Academic integrity
Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see
Important Guidelines & Support.
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 
Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.
 
 
 
Required Resources
Required reading materials
As per the EAL112 Unit Reading List
 
Recommended reading materials
Recommended Readings are set by the Unit Coordinator as readings that will be useful for this Unit to develop your knowledge and understanding of teaching and course-specific content. A list of further readings will be accessible in the unit content.
Boud, D. (1988). Moving toward autonomy. In Boud, D. (Ed.), Developing student autonomy in learning (2nd ed.), (pp.17-39). London: Kogan Page.
Bruner, J. S. (1963).
On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
Dixon, L., Harvey, J., Thompson, R., & Williamson, S. (2010). Practical teaching. In Avis, J., Fisher, R., & Thompson, R. (Eds.).
Teaching in lifelong learning: A guide to theory and practice (pp.119-142). Maidenhead: McGraw Hill
Forster, D.J. (2012) Codes of Ethics in Australian Education: Towards a National Perspective.
Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37 (9), 0-17.
Grabinger, R.S., & Dunlap, J.C. (1995). Rich environments for active learning; A definition.
Association for Learning Technology Journal, 3 (2), 5-34.
Harrison, L. (2006). What is applied learning? Exploring understandings of applied learning amongst beginning teachers.
AARE 2006: Conference papers, abstracts, and symposia. Coldstream: AARE.
Herrington, A., & Herrington, J. (2006).
Authentic learning environments in higher education. Hershey: Infosci.
Itin. C.M. (1999). Reasserting the philosophy of experiential education as a vehicle for change in the 21st century.
The Journal of Experiential Education, 22 (2), 91-98.
Jarvis, P. (2010).
Adult education and lifelong learning: Theory and practice (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
 
Other required resources
Applied Learning units utilize Zoom conferencing software. To ensure the best results, it is recommended that students have a USB headset.