Unit Outline
CNA416
Leadership in Practice
Semester 1, 2026
Melanie Greenwood
School of Nursing
Health (Portfolio)
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B
Unit Coordinator
Melanie Greenwood
Email: Melanie.Greenwood@utas.edu.au
 
What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
This unit will introduce the student to various leadership evaluation approaches and leadership impact through critical reflection. Students will engage with a variety of evaluation methodologies and tools suitable for evaluating self, others and projects.
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1
Identify a variety of evaluation methodologies and approaches and their application to practice.
2
Appraise evidence that contributes to organisation wide transformational change and ongoing practice development.
3
Interpret performance data and information to demonstrate the potential impact and outcomes of your practice change.
4
Validate leadership impact through well-developed judgement and critical reflection of the complexities addressed in an applied evaluation framework.
Alterations as a result of student feedback
Unit content has been updated and assessment resources amended as a result of student feedback.
 
 
Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
Online
Individual Study
Individual self-directed learning - 10 hours per week.
10
StudyPeriod 12 times
Online Class
Online webinar - 3 x 1 hour
1
Study Period 3 times
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online or includes online activities, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline or MyLO, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 
How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
Facilitated Discussion
Week 4
20 %
LO1, LO2
Assessment Task 2:
Evaluation Plan
Week 8
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 3:
Critical Reflective Oral Presentation
Week 12
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
 
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: Facilitated Discussion
Task Description:
This assessment task requires you to participate in online discussions postings and engage with prescribed activity tasks.
Week 1: Discussion opens
Week 3: Discussion board closes
Task Length:
800 words
Due Date:
Week 4
Weight:
20 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Completes all activities in the weeks identified in the directions for the assessment.
LO1
2
Contribution to the activities indicate deep engagement with unit content and academic literature and supports the learning of others.
LO1, LO2
3
Communicate clearly and succinctly leading concepts generated from discussions.
LO1, LO2
 
Assessment Task 2: Evaluation Plan
Task Description:
This assessment task requires you to identify an evaluation framework which you will use to lead a project or leadership evaluation plan.
Task Length:
1500 words
Due Date:
Week 8
Weight:
40 %
 
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Demonstrates application of an evaluation framework relevant to leading practice change in complex practice settings.
LO1, LO2
2
Presents a clear, concise, and practical plan demonstrating autonomy and well developed
judgment guided by the preceding framework, applicable to the individual project or leadership framework.
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
3
Demonstrates the ability to gather and use evidence for evaluation of practice change reflecting leadership capabilities.
LO3, LO4
4
Communicate clearly and succinctly using authentic voice in writing style.
LO4
 
Assessment Task 3: Critical Reflective Oral Presentation
Task Description:
This assessment task requires you to present your impact as a leader in your practice setting implementing or planning a practice change initiative in a format of professional dialogue. You will be asked questions at the end of your presentation to demonstrate your analytic, critical and reflective capabilities.
Task Length:
Equivalent to 1500 words (10 mins presentation + 10 mins Q&A )
Due Date:
Week 12
Weight:
40 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Depth of reflection demonstrates a critique of the leadership skills, knowledge and capability required to influence an evaluation approach for a practice initiative through engagement with the literature.
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
2
Demonstrates a clearly synthesised analysis of the potential challenges in leading self and projects to enable change in individuals and teams.
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
3
Demonstrates through reflection the ways leaders impact teams to influence culture change and sustain person centredness.
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
4
Communicates clearly and responds accurately and succinctly to questions.
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
 
 
 
How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
Academic progress review
The results for this unit may be included in a review of your academic progress. For information about progress reviews and what they mean for all students, see Academic Progress Review in the Student Portal.
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
Academic integrity
Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see
Important Guidelines & Support.
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 
Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.
 
 
 
Required Resources
Required reading materials
There are no required textbooks for this unit.
Required Readings will be provided by your Unit Coordinator.
 
Recommended reading materials
Recommended Readings will be provided by your Unit Coordinator via the Reading List link in MyLO, or the unit Reading List on the University Library website.
 
Other required resources