Unit Outline

Sound and effective management and leadership require not only financial and technical expertise but also ethical competency. This unit provides a focus on ethical decision-making, and in particular introduces a series of frameworks for discerning what is right and wrong in important areas of business practice. Ethical competency is the ability to, a) perceive the ethical implications of a situation, b) engage in sound ethical reasoning, and c) develop sustainable problem-solving strategies.

Intended Learning Outcomes

As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.

On completion of this unit, you will be able to:


1.	Describe theories and concepts of ethical reasoning
2.	Explain the ethical issues of relevance to a business context
3.	Apply ethical reasoning to make evidence-based management decisions
4.	Communicate complex ethical analyses and judgements using a team-based approach

Requisites


REQUISITE TYPE	REQUISITES
Pre-requisite	1 x introductory level, or higher, unit
Anti-requisite (mutual excl)	BMA350, BAA310

Alterations as a result of student feedback

How will I be Assessed?

For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.

Assessment schedule


ASSESSMENT TASK #	ASSESSMENT TASK NAME	DATE DUE	WEIGHT	LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:	Team Case Analysis	Week 5	30 %	LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 2:	Live Case Analysis	Week 10	30 %	LO2, LO3
Assessment Task 3:	Capstone Assessment	Week 13	40 %	LO1, LO2, LO3

Assessment details

Assessment Task 1: Team Case Analysis

Task Description:

Sudents will work in small teams (3 - 5 students) to prepare and deliver a recorded presentation explaining relevant ethical theories and analysing provided cases.

Task Length:

20 minutes

Due Date:

Week 5

Weight:

30 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Define key foundational ethics theory: Utilitarianism	LO1
2	Define key foundational ethics theory: Kantian Ethics	LO1
3	Define key foundational ethics theory: Ethical Rights	LO1
4	Define key foundational ethics theory: Distributive Justice	LO1
5	Identify relevant case facts and case issues	LO2
6	Define the ethical dilemma and punishments	LO2
7	Present a logical application of Utilitarianism	LO3
8	Present a logical application of Kantian Ethics	LO3
9	Present a logical application of Ethical Rights	LO3
10	Present a logical application of Distributive Justice	LO3
11	Communicate a team-based analysis and sustainable resolution(s) to the ethical dilemma	LO4
12	Demonstrate the student’s unique contribution to the team’s case analysis	LO4

Assessment Task 2: Live Case Analysis

Task Description:

Students will select one (1) of three (3) provided cases and prepare a written ethics analysis report.

Task Length:

2500 words

Due Date:

Week 10

Weight:

30 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Identify relevant case facts	LO2
2	Identify relevant case issues (Decision Maker)	LO2
3	Identify relevant case issues (Ethical Dilemma)	LO2
4	Present a logical application of Utilitarianism	LO3
5	Present a logical application of Kantian Ethics	LO3
6	Present a logical application of Ethical Rights	LO3
7	Present a logical application of Distributive Justice	LO3
8	Communicate sustainable resolution(s) of the Ethical Dilemma	LO3
9	Present logical communication via compliance with referencing and presentation standards (i.e., expression, spelling, grammar, page numbers, double line spacing)	LO3

Assessment Task 3: Capstone Assessment

Task Description:

Students will select four (4) cases from a choice of seven (7) alternatives and provide analyses that identify, explain, and resolve relevant ethical problems evident in the chosen cases.

Note that the cases for the Capstone Assessment will not be made available to students until the start of Week 13.

Task Length:

3000 words

Due Date:

Week 13

Weight:

40 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Identify and define the relevant business ethics topic(s) in the case	LO2
2	Explain the business ethics problem(s) using ethics theory, concepts, or processes	LO1
3	Communicate a logical resolution and/or prevention of the business ethics problem(s)	LO3

How your final result is determined

To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.

Submission of assignments

Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.

Academic integrity

Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see Important Guidelines & Support.

Requests for extensions

If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.

A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.

The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.

Late penalties

Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.

Review of results and appeals

You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.

Required Resources

Required reading materials

There is no prescribed text for this unit. See MyLO for access to the required readings in this unit.