Unit Outline
ZAS124
Regulatory Challenges
Semester 1, 2025
Robin Katersky Barnes
University College
University College
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B

Unit Coordinator
Robin Katersky Barnes
Email: Robin.Barnes@utas.edu.au
What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
 

In this unit you will be introduced to the regulatory environment in which applied science enterprises operate. In particular, you will explore the regulatory challenges of product safety, biosecurity and environment protection, as well as business practices inherent in product development, manufacture and commercialisation. You will gain familiarity with various bodies (including local, state and federal government) that regulate applied science enterprises, learn how various tools including Australian and international standards support regulatory compliance by business, and apply your knowledge to explore questions of compliance in work-based scenarios. 
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1
Describe the regulatory and stakeholder framework in which applied science enterprises operate
2
Apply tools and frameworks to navigate the regulatory challenges faced by applied science enterprises
3
Analyse potential ethical, environmental and economic risks associated with non-compliance in the context of applied science industry
Requisites
REQUISITE TYPE
REQUISITES
Anti-requisite (mutual excl)
ZAS106
ZAS116
ZAS232
Alterations as a result of student feedback
To be determined.
 
 

Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
Online
Tutorial (Online)
5-6:30pm starting in week 1
1.50
1 time per fortnight
Lecture (Online)
Online Learning Materials
1
Weekly
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online or includes online activities, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline or MyLO, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 

How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
AT1: Annotated Stakeholder Mind Map
Week 3
20 %
LO1, LO3
Assessment Task 2:
AT2: Compliance Tool Application - Oral Presentation
Week 9
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
Assessment Task 3:
AT3: Risk Management and Implementation Plan
Week 13
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
 
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: AT1: Annotated Stakeholder Mind Map
Task Description:
Who cares if I get it right?
For Assessment Task 1 you will select and use one of the scenarios provided to create an annotated stakeholder mind map (full details for each of the scenarios will be provided in MyLO).
To complete this assessment task
1. Read your chosen scenario and take a look at the resources and links provided to start your thinking.
2. Around the central question of “who cares that I get it right”, and clearly identifying your chosen scenario, you will produce a mind map on one A4 page, identifying at least 6 but not more than 12 stakeholders of key relevance for the scenario.
3. You will also provide annotation of the stakeholder mind map on 2 - 4 additional pages (A4, 12pt font, 1 x line spacing and normal margins). Your annotation should be detailed and provide clear comments that demonstrate your knowledge of how each of the stakeholders you have identified may affect and / or be affected by the events that have occurred within the scenario.
Task Length:
1 page mind map as pdf (A4) 2 – 4 pages appended annotation as pdf (A4, 12 pt font, 1 x line spacing and normal margins)
Due Date:
Week 3
Weight:
20 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Identify and describe key stakeholders
LO1
2
Use creative and/or visual techniques to communicate stakeholder relationships
LO1
3
Analyse how stakeholders affect and/or are affected by the chosen scenario
LO3
 
Assessment Task 2: AT2: Compliance Tool Application - Oral Presentation
Task Description:
How can I know that I'm getting it right?

For Assessment Task 2 you will use a compliance tool to address the question “how can I know that I am getting it right?” within the context of the development of a new, fictitious product or process by a fictitious company in the fermentation and separation or aquaculture industry. You will play the role of Project Leader for the introduction of the new fictitious product or process, and you have been requested by your CEO to deliver a 12 - 15 minute (8 - 10 slide) PowerPoint briefing to your company’s executive team to convince them that the company is getting it right when it comes to compliance for the new product or process. To assist you in the preparation of your PowerPoint select and use one of the following compliance tools to provide a framework for your briefing.

- Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
- Aquaculture Farm Biosecurity Plan (DAWR)

Further details can be found in the Assessment Task Sheet.
Task Length:
½ - 1 page introduction (A4, 12 pt font, 1 x line spacing and normal margins) 8 – 10 slide PowerPoint presentation 12 – 15 minute oral presentation
Due Date:
Week 9
Weight:
40 %
 
 

CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Describe company, product or process, and matter of compliance
LO1
2
Apply selected tool to create a compliance framework
LO2
3
Critically reflect on compliance/non-compliance
LO3
4
Use technologies and visual representation and techniques to communicate ideas and information
LO1
 
Assessment Task 3: AT3: Risk Management and Implementation Plan
Task Description:
Risk Management and Implementation Plan

What happens if I don't get it right?

Assessment Task 3 is both a group and individual project. Select and use one of the four applied science industry projects provided OR propose your group’s own project to work with, and develop a risk management plan.

If you are choosing a project drawn from your own industry experience you must have permission to work on this project; you are not able to work on confidential projects for this assessment task.

The assessment task
Using the resources provided, create a risk management plan as guided by the assessment task sheet.

Individual assessment: Discussion paper on safety culture from different perspectives from within your organisation. Roles will be assigned to your group and may include CEO, management, production manager, technician, factory hand etc.
Task Length:
Group assessment: 6-8 pages Individual assessment: Discussion paper 1000 words
Due Date:
Week 13
Weight:
40 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Introduce the industry project and regulatory framework
LO2
2
Use a risk assessment tool to prioritise risks and risk management
LO1
3
Critically reflect on the development and implementation of risk management plan through the lens of safety culture from an assigned role
LO3
 
 
 

How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
Academic progress review
The results for this unit may be included in a review of your academic progress. For information about progress reviews and what they mean for all students, see Academic Progress Review in the Student Portal.
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
Academic integrity
Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see
Important Guidelines & Support.
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 

Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.