Unit Outline
ZAC106
Quality Systems and Practices in Health and Community Services
Semester 2, 2025
Kendal Sylvester
University College
University College
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B

Unit Coordinator
Kendal Sylvester
Email: kendal.sylvester@utas.edu.au
What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
 

This unit will introduce you to the quality, safety and regulatory systems that govern service delivery, reporting and accreditation. Principles, policies, standards and guidelines will be considered in the context of the worker, the consumer and the organisation. A cycle of continuous quality improvement involving planning, implementation, evaluation and adaptation will be emphasised, including the central role of consumers in these processes. You will also explore the importance of organisational vision and values, and the roles and responsibilities of staff and volunteers in quality systems and practices.
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1
Evaluate quality improvement principles and processes and explain how quality, safety, standards and outcomes are measured and reported in practice
2
Reflect upon and describe the role of professionals, consumers and organisations in continuous quality improvement
3
Communicate quality improvement solutions for practice-based issues and risks
Alterations as a result of student feedback
To be determined.
 
 

Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
Online
Tutorial (Online)
2 x 2-hour online tutorials
2
Study Period 2 times
Lecture (Online)
1 x 3-hour online workshop per semester
3
Study Period 1 time
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online or includes online activities, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline or MyLO, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 

How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
Quality and Safety Analysis
Week 5
25 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
Assessment Task 2:
Review of Standards and Accreditation
Week 10
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
Assessment Task 3:
Quality Improvement Case Study
Week 14
35 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
 
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: Quality and Safety Analysis
Task Description:
This task requires you to draw from a range of learning activities and resources relating to quality and safety in health and community services. This will involve undertaking a quality and safety assessment (audit) of a chosen environment or context.

You will then analyse your learnings from this audit and propose ideas for improvement, informed by the principles of quality and safety.

A dedicated Assessment Task 1 Information Page and will be provided in MyLO.
Task Length:
600 words
Due Date:
Week 5
Weight:
25 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Conduct and critically analyse the findings of a quality and safety audit based on key principles of quality improvement
LO1
2
Use quality and safety principles and processes to propose improvements for identified issues or risks
LO3
3
Describe the role of professionals, consumers, and/or organisations in these proposed improvements
LO2
 
Assessment Task 2: Review of Standards and Accreditation
Task Description:
This assessment task will consider quality improvement for a virtual community service (Yewsee Community Services).

There are 2 parts to this Assessment:

Part 1 requires you to respond to a series of questions regarding quality improvement for the community service. Based on scenarios provided, you will consider the client, the worker, and the organisation to inform your answers.

Part 2 requires you to analyse a case study through the lens of health and community service Standards. You will review principles, practices, and examples from health and community services to make recommendations about the evidence required to demonstrate these Standards.

The task will culminate in a written report (Template) based on instructions provided via a dedicated Assessment Task 2 page in MyLO.
Task Length:
750 words
Due Date:
Week 10
Weight:
40 %
 
 

CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Evaluate quality systems and standards from the perspective of the client, worker,
and organisation
LO2
2
Develop consumer-centred and evidence-informed recommendations for quality
improvement and accreditation
LO1
3
Communicate recommendations in the context of the designated case study
LO3
 
Assessment Task 3: Quality Improvement Case Study
Task Description:
This assessment task will conclude our consideration of quality and safety at Yewsee Community Services.

Drawing upon your knowledge of quality and safety principles and processes, you will analyse a selected case study, identify any risks, and propose quality improvement and risk management responses.

You will present your analysis and responses as a recorded presentation.

Further guidelines will be provided on a dedicated Assessment Task 3 Page in MyLO.
Task Length:
10-minute Presentation
Due Date:
Week 14
Weight:
35 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Identify and analyse quality and safety issues and risks
LO1
2
Explain the impact of quality and safety factors on key stakeholders (consumers,
workers and organisations)
LO2
3
Apply knowledge of CQI frameworks to develop and communicate evidence-informed risk
management and quality improvement responses (solutions)
LO1, LO3
4
Communicate in a clear and professional manner
LO3
 
 
 

How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
Academic progress review
The results for this unit may be included in a review of your academic progress. For information about progress reviews and what they mean for all students, see Academic Progress Review in the Student Portal.
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
Academic integrity
Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see
Important Guidelines & Support.
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 

Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.