Unit Outline
KSM715
Antarctic Governance and Policy in the 21st Century
Semester 1, 2025
Jeffrey McGee
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies
College of Sciences and Engineering
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B

Unit Coordinator
Jeffrey McGee
Email: Jeffrey.McGee@utas.edu.au
 

What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
Antarctica and the Southern Ocean are a unique biophysical region of the planet and similarly have unique governance arrangements. This unit provides an advanced analysis of the institutions, rules and power structures which govern the Antarctic region. The unit closely examines the Antarctic Treaty System, but also other important institutions that play a governance role in the region, including the International Whaling Commission and International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators. Drawing on theories of law, governance and geopolitics, this unit explores the following thematic challenges relating to human activity in the Antarctic region: Antarctic Resources, Antarctic Science, Antarctic Infrastructure and Logistics, Strategic issues in Antarctica, Environmental Protection, and Climate Change. The unit explores the interactions between nation states, non-state actors and international organisations and the intersection of interests, rights and rules in the development of Antarctic governance institutions. Completing the unit will equip students from a wide variety of academic disciplines with the ability to view governance of Antarctica from a more holistic perspective. This will assist students to understand and critically assess the basis for international policy decisions relating to Antarctic and the Southern Ocean, a region of key national interest for Australia, and of vital importance for global ecosystems and the international political system.
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1
Analyse the Antarctic Treaty System from historical, legal, geopolitical and scientific perspectives.
2
Analyse the intersections between the Antarctic Treaty System and other governance institutions in the area to further policy choices
3
Appraise the effectiveness of Antarctic governance institutions to inform policy debate and choice
4
Critically assess the key challenges for Antarctic governance in the early 21st century
Requisites
REQUISITE TYPE
REQUISITES
Anti-requisite (mutual excl)
KSA201
Alterations as a result of student feedback
 
 
 

Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online or includes online activities, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline or MyLO, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 

How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
Multiple Choice Test
Week 4
20 %
LO1
Assessment Task 2:
Critical Analysis of Antarctic Literature
Week 8
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 3:
Group Report: Drafting and Presenting an Antarctic Policy Document
Week 14
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
 
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: Multiple Choice Test
Task Description:
Online open book multiple choice test on fundamental knowledge of the Antarctic Treaty System
Task Length:
20 multiple choice questions
Due Date:
Week 4
Weight:
20 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Identify historical, legal, geopolitical and scientific aspects of the Antarctic Treaty System
LO1
2
Describe characteristics of the Antarctic Treaty System
LO1
3
Interpret varying perspectives in relation to Antarctic Treaty System
LO1
 
Assessment Task 2: Critical Analysis of Antarctic Literature
Task Description:
Students will be provided with a piece of Antarctic Governance literature such as an opinion piece or short article and will critically analyse and assess it to provide a written review.
Task Length:
2500 words
Due Date:
Week 8
Weight:
40 %
 
 

CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Assess the factual, interpretative and normative claims made in the literature
LO4
2
Analyse the claims made in the literature against the rules and norms of the Antarctic Treaty System and other governance institutions in the region
LO4
3
Explain the different views on measuring the effectiveness of international institutions
LO3
4
Apply theories of effectiveness to the Antarctic treaty system
LO3
5
Assess the significance and consequences of regime intersection in managing the Antarctic region
LO2
6
Interpret varying perspectives in relation to Antarctic Treaty System
LO1
 
Assessment Task 3: Group Report: Drafting and Presenting an Antarctic Policy Document
Task Description:
Students will work in small teams of up to 3 students to draft a mock policy document for submission to an international meeting of the Antarctic Treaty System. Students in these teams will draft the document and then present the document to the class in a short 15 minute presentation, including answering questions about it. The group presentation will be delivered in Week 9 and the report in week 14.
Task Length:
1750 words for policy document 750 words of explanatory material for presentation
Due Date:
Week 14
Weight:
40 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Interpret varying perspectives in relation to Antarctic Treaty System
LO1
2
Communicate the strengths and weaknesses of Antarctic governance to relevant audiences
LO1
3
Describe the points of intersection between the Antarctic Treaty System and other governance institutions in the area
LO2
4
Assess the significance and consequences of regime intersection in managing the Antarctic region
LO2
5
Explain the different views on measuring the effectiveness of international institutions
LO3
6
Apply theories of effectiveness to the Antarctic treaty system
LO3
7
Use Antarctic governance and broader literature to inform perspectives and assessment
LO4
 
 
 

How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
Academic progress review
The results for this unit may be included in a review of your academic progress. For information about progress reviews and what they mean for all students, see Academic Progress Review in the Student Portal.
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
Academic integrity
Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see
Important Guidelines & Support.
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 

Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.
 
 
 

Required Resources
Required reading materials
To be included in unit outline
 
Recommended reading materials
To be included in unit outline
 
Other required resources
Access to library resources for online articles, books etc.