Unit Outline
ESP319
Sports Coaching
Semester 1, 2025
Thomas Hartley
Faculty of Education
College of Arts, Law and Education
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B

Unit Coordinator
Thomas Hartley
Email: T.Hartley@utas.edu.au
 

What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
This unit develops knowledge and skills in sports coaching, with a large emphasis placed on coaching pedagogy highlighting the social, cultural, and pedagogical concepts underpinning good coaching practice. It touches on the application of sports science principles outlined by the Australian Sports Commission to the coaching environment.
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1
critically investigate and explain contemporary coaching practices.
2
evaluate reflective tools which can be used to judge performance of athletes and own coaching performance.
3
identify, analyse, discuss possible implications of coaching practice, and outline strategies to counteract.
Alterations as a result of student feedback
 
 
 

Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
On Campus
Workshop
No Description
1
Weekly
Tutorial
No Description
2
Weekly
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online or includes online activities, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline or MyLO, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 

How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
The Coach as a Reflective Practitioner
Week 5
30 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
Assessment Task 2:
Case Studies
Week 9
30 %
LO1, LO3
Assessment Task 3:
Practical Coaching and Analysis
Refer to Assessment Description
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
 
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: The Coach as a Reflective Practitioner
Task Description:
In this assessment task, you will reflect on a significant coaching experience that has shaped your coaching philosophy and approach. The task is divided into two complementary parts.
In the first part, you will select one meaningful coaching encounter and describe the event, briefly exploring what happened, who was involved and the outcome. You will critically analyse how contemporary and historical coaching practices influenced this experience, identify the coaching styles or methods used, and evaluate the encounter’s impact on your coaching beliefs and values.

In the second part, you will look to the future, applying insights gained from your reflection to shape your future coaching practice. You will detail specific coaching strategies you intend to adopt or refine, referencing at least two models of reflective practice. You will also explain how reflective tools will enhance your coaching effectiveness and provide practical examples of how you will implement these tools, such as through self-evaluation forms or peer feedback.

This task encourages you to critically engage with your own experiences and develop evidence-based strategies for continuous improvement in coaching practice.
Task Length:
1250 Words
Due Date:
Week 5
Weight:
30 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Illustrate knowledge of contemporary coaching practices
LO1
2
Illustrate knowledge of reflective tools which can be used to judge performance of athletes and own coaching performance
LO2
3
Describe and analyse implications of coaching principles and various practices
LO3
 
Assessment Task 2: Case Studies
Task Description:
You will be presented with six different case studies from which you choose two to respond to. In responding to each of the two case studies you will need to address the criteria below.

To analyse each case studies, adopt the perspective that you are involved with the scenarios and could influence what happens, if you wish to. Provide a description of how you would influence these scenarios, and a brief justification of why you would make these decisions.
Task Length:
1000 words
Due Date:
Week 9
Weight:
30 %
 
 

CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Overview of what has occurred in the case study, and why you believe this has occurred
LO1
2
Who is impacted in the case study and how you believe they are impacted
LO3
3
Relevant coaching theory where applicable, or explanation, to substantiate your overview
LO1
4
Potential implications that may result from the case study
LO3
 
Assessment Task 3: Practical Coaching and Analysis
Task Description:
In pairs, you will plan, deliver, and reflect on a 45-minute coaching session that incorporates contemporary coaching practices and reflective tools. These sessions will be conducted during tutorials throughout the semester. Active engagement in your peers' sessions, including providing constructive feedback, will contribute to your overall grade, emphasising collaboration, participation, and reflective practice.

This assessment task is worth 40% of your unit grade and is broken down as follows:

Peer Feedback (10%): Quality and relevance of feedback you provide to peers.
Peer Feedback Average (10%): Average score received from peers for your session's effectiveness and engagement.
Session Plan & Self-Evaluation (20%): Quality of the session plan and depth of reflection on strengths, areas for improvement, and strategies for future coaching.
Task Length:
Equivalent to 1000 words
Due Date:
Refer to Assessment Description
Weight:
40 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Coaching Session Delivery and Engagement
LO1, LO3
2
Peer Feedback and Contribution
LO2, LO3
3
Session Planning and Reflective Self-Evaluation
LO1, LO2
 
 
 

How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
Academic progress review
The results for this unit may be included in a review of your academic progress. For information about progress reviews and what they mean for all students, see Academic Progress Review in the Student Portal.
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
Academic integrity
Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see
Important Guidelines & Support.
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 

Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.
 
 
 

Required Resources
Required reading materials
 
 
Recommended reading materials
Camire, M., & Trudel, P. (2014). Helping youth sport coaches integrate psychological skills in their coaching practice. Qualitative Research in Sport, exercise, and Health. 6(4): 617-634.
Castillo, D.B., Alexandria, M., Balibay, V., Alarcon, J.A., Picar, J.M., Lampitoc, R.R., & Baylon, M.C. (2014). Autocratic and participatory coaching styles and its effects on students’ dance performances. International Journal of Learning,Teaching, and Educational Research, 3(1): 32-44.
Hall, E.T., & Gray, S. (2015). Reflecting on reflective practices: a coach’s action research narratives. Institute for Sport, Physical Education and Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh.
Knowles, Z., Borrie, A., & Telfer, H. (2005). Towards the reflective sports coach: issues of context, education, and application. Ergonomics, 48(11-14): 1711-1720.
Kovacs, L., & Corrie, S. (2017). Building reflective capability to enhance coaching practice. The Coaching Psychologist, 13(1): 4-12.
Marcone, M. (2017). The impact of coaching styles on the motivation and performance of athletes. Kinesiology, Sport Studies, and Physical Education.
Parker, K., Czech, D., Burdette, T., Stewart, J., Biber, D., Easton, L., Pecinovsky, C., Carson, S., & McDaniel, T. (2012). The preferred coaching styles of generation z athletes: A qualitative study. Journal of Coach Education, 5(2); 5- 23.
West, L. (2016). Coach-athlete communication: Coaching style, leadership characteristics, and psychological outcomes. Masters of Education in Human Movement Sport and Leisure Studies Graduate Projects. 16.
Witte, K.E. (2010). Coaching philosophy: A systematic approach for development. Journal of Coach Education, 3(2): 40-49.
Young, B.W., & North, J. (2007). Towards a definition of excellence in sport coaching. Journal of Coaching Science, 1(1): 3-17.
 
Other required resources