Unit Outline
ESP231
HPE Pedagogy
Semester 2, 2025
Thomas Hartley
Faculty of Education
College of Arts, Law and Education
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B

Unit Coordinator
Thomas Hartley
Email: T.Hartley@utas.edu.au
 

What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
In this unit, you will be introduced to the Teaching as Inquiry model as the basis for developing an understanding of effective teaching and learning principles and research, and how these apply to Health and Physical Education (HPE) contexts. You will also become conversant with the Australian HPE Curriculum, understand key elements of curriculum implementation, and learn to critically reflect on their teaching practice in HPE contexts.
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1
Apply a Teaching as Inquiry Model to curriculum planning and implementation for HPE teaching and learning.
2
Discuss and explain principles of effective pedagogy that relate to teaching and learning in health and physical education (HPE).
3
Critically reflect on key elements of quality HPE teaching and learning.
4
Explore a range of methods and approaches for assessment in HPE, and design an assessment task for a learning sequence
Alterations as a result of student feedback
 
 
 

Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online or includes online activities, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline or MyLO, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 

How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
Teaching as Inquiry Plan
See the MyLO site for the due date
50 %
LO1, LO2
Assessment Task 2:
Reflection and Assessment Design
See the MyLO site for the due date
50 %
LO2, LO3, LO4
 
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: Teaching as Inquiry Plan
Task Description:
Assessment Task 1: Teaching as Inquiry Plan
Description:
Plan a sequence of three lessons using the Teaching as Inquiry model for your Work Integrated Learning (WIL) at Riverside Primary School. Your focus should be on Fundamental Movement Skills (FMS) for lower primary students and their application through games in upper primary. The plan should align with quality teaching principles and be supported by relevant academic references.

Key Components:

Focusing Inquiry: Understanding the school context, student needs, rationale, intended learning outcomes, and curriculum links.
Teaching Inquiry: Selection and justification of teaching strategies and activities that support student learning.
Learning Inquiry: Briefly outline an assessment strategy to measure learning outcomes.
Task Length:
2000 words
Due Date:
See the MyLO site for the due date
Weight:
50 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Clarity and alignment of learning outcomes, rationale, and curriculum links
LO1
2
Appropriateness and justification of teaching strategies and activities
LO1, LO2
3
Quality and usability of the lesson sequence for implementation
LO1, LO2
4
Demonstrated ability to engage with academic literature and communicate ideas clearly
LO1
 
Assessment Task 2: Reflection and Assessment Design
Task Description:
This task explores effective pedagogy in HPE and requires you to design an assessment tool.

Part A: Literature Engagement (750 words, 50%) – Discuss key principles of effective pedagogy in HPE, drawing on academic literature. Explain how these principles inform teaching strategies and assessment approaches in HPE.

Part B: Assessment Design (750 words, 50%) – Develop a relevant assessment tool. Justify its design, application, and alignment with curriculum standards. Consider differentiation and inclusive practice.
Task Length:
1500 words
Due Date:
See the MyLO site for the due date
Weight:
50 %
 
 

CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Use of academic literature to support pedagogical discussion
LO3
2
Application of effective pedagogy principles to assessment design
LO2, LO3, LO4
3
Quality and applicability of the assessment tool, including differentiation
LO4
4
Clarity and coherence of written communication
LO3
 
 
 

How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
Academic progress review
The results for this unit may be included in a review of your academic progress. For information about progress reviews and what they mean for all students, see Academic Progress Review in the Student Portal.
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
Academic integrity
Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see
Important Guidelines & Support.
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 

Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.
 
 
 

Required Resources
Required reading materials
 
 
Recommended reading materials
Health and Physical Education Version 9 Health and Physical Education | V9 Australian Curriculum
Burrows, L., Macdonald, D. & Wright, J. (2013). Critical inquiry and problem solving in physical education: Working with students in schools. London, UK: Routledge.
Dudley, D., Telford, A., Winslade, M., Stonehouse, C., & Peralta, L. (2020). Teaching quality health and physical education (2nd Edition). Victoria, Australia: Cengage.
Hickson, C. & Fishburne, G. (2004). What is effective physical education teaching, and can it be promoted with generalist trained elementary school teachers? Proceedings from the AARE Annual Conference, Melbourne, 2004. Retrieved from https://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2004/hic04158.pdf
Inquiry-based learning in Health and Physical Education – A Resource Guide for Educators (2016). Retrieved from https://teachingtools.ophea.net/sites/default/files/pdf/ibl_guide.pdf
Killen, R. (2013). Effective teaching strategies (6th ed). Melbourne, AUS: Cengage Learning.
McMaster, N. (2019). Teaching health and physical education in early childhood and primary years. Australia. Oxford University Press.
Tinning, R. & Bailey (2009). Pedagogy and Human Movement: Theory, Practice, Research. UK: Taylor & Francis.
University of Tasmania (2015). APA. In Referencing and assignment writing. Retrieved from http://utas.libguides.com/content.php?pid=27520&sid=199805
 
 
Other required resources