Unit Outline
EDP707
Literacy, Mathematics and Science in Early Childhood
Semester 1, 2025
Lauren Armstrong
Faculty of Education
College of Arts, Law and Education
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B

Unit Coordinator
Lauren Armstrong
Email: Lauren.Armstrong@utas.edu.au
 

What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
This unit develops pedagogical knowledge for teaching literacy, mathematics and science in early childhood, with references to STEM and STEAM integration. Using an Early Childhood lens, key approaches and pedagogies are explored to evaluate their significance on early development in these pivotal learning areas. The unit reflects upon early learning in diverse contexts with an emphasis on the role of place, families and communities. It encourages students to consider the value of play and inquiry-based pedagogies; and how to weave concepts of sustainability through exposure to natural and built environments. Throughout the unit, students will have opportunities to apply and extend their knowledge, skills, and understandings in authentic ways, ensuring meaningful connections between theoretical knowledge and practical application.
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1
Identify key concepts of literacy, mathematics and science essential for early childhood education, illustrating basic pedagogical foundations
2
Implement literacy, mathematics and science activities using appropriate pedagogical strategies in early childhood settings
3
Examine and critique integrated literacy, mathematics and science learning experiences to determine their impact on children's developmental progress
4
Compose academic work that communicates ideas effectively using APA referencing and standard English conventions, reflecting engagement with scholarly literature
Requisites
REQUISITE TYPE
REQUISITES
Anti-requisite (mutual excl)
ESM781
Alterations as a result of student feedback
•    Unit ILOs have been slightly rephrased to increase clarity and assessment validity.
•    Assessment Tasks have been refreshed to enhance the clarity, flexibility and diversification of tasks for student learning.
 
 
 

Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
Online
Lecture (Online)
Engaging with the weekly 1–2-hr Lecture/Learning Seminars
2
Weekly
Independent Learning
Engagement with unit content, readings and materials
6
Weekly
Online Class
Sharing activity responses and engaging in collaborative discussions
2
Weekly
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online or includes online activities, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline or MyLO, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 

How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
AT1: Building Foundations – Early Childhood Knowledge Quiz
Week 4
20 %
LO1, LO4
Assessment Task 2:
AT2: Video Presentation – Play and Inquiry-Based Pedagogies
Week 9
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 3:
AT3: Integrated Curriculum Design Project
Week 13
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
 
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: AT1: Building Foundations – Early Childhood Knowledge Quiz
Task Description:
By the end of Week 3, students will be prepared to undertake their first Assessment Task [AT1]. This individual, formative assessment task involves the completion of a compulsory Online Knowledge Quiz to measure students’ current levels of engagement and understanding related to key unit topics covered in Module 1.

The AT1 Quiz is structured into a series of selected response items, (e.g., ‘True/False’ and ‘Multiple Choice’ questions); and should take approximately 20 minutes to complete. However, there is no set time limit and multiple attempts are permitted. Students must complete this Quiz to progress to the next Modules of the unit.

Information regarding the assessment and grading process for this task is located in the Assignment section in MyLO.

Completion of this Assessment Task relates to the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APSTs): 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.5, 4.1, 6.1, 6.2.
Task Length:
20 minutes (approximately)
Due Date:
Week 4
Weight:
20 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Demonstrate an accurate understanding of fundamental literacy, mathematics and science concepts essential for early childhood education (40%)
LO1
2
Identify and apply key principles from the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF) relevant to early childhood education (30%)
LO1
3
Demonstrate comprehension of the integration of STEM/STEAM into early childhood education (20%)
LO1
4
Communicate ideas with precision and clarity, providing accurate and relevant responses that reflect the foundational concepts of early childhood education (10%)
LO4
 
Assessment Task 2: AT2: Video Presentation – Play and Inquiry-Based Pedagogies
Task Description:
For the second Assessment Task (AT2), students are required to create a 10-15-minute, recorded Video Presentation that critiques the theory and practice of play and inquiry-based pedagogies in early childhood education.

This individual, summative assessment task should focus on literacy, mathematics and science learning, highlighting perceived benefits and challenges. Students are encouraged to make connections between these pedagogies and their own professional contexts, practice and experiences, demonstrating how these approaches may influence their practice. This critique should be grounded in relevant scholarly literature, offering a balanced perspective that includes theoretical and practical considerations.

Additional Requirements and Information:
When developing and recording the presentation, students are encouraged to:
• Utilise creative presentation formats and performance styles
• Select an intended type of audience for the presentation.

For this Assessment Task, students can select their own presentation format (e.g., PowerPoint, Canva, Prezi, etc.). When developing the presentation, it is important to include a written script (with references included) to submit along with a copy of their recorded presentation.

Students must submit two files for this Assessment Task:
1. An MP4 video recording of the presentation [15-20 minutes]
2. The original presentation file with access to the written script.

It is recommended that these files be Saved in accordance with University file-naming conventions, e.g., Smith_John-EDP707-AT2.

Students should also ensure that their name and student ID are listed clearly within their presentation file.

Standard descriptors for the assignment criteria are included in the AT2 assessment rubric, located in the Assignment section in MyLO.

Completion of this Assessment Task relates to the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APSTs): 1.2, 2.1, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 5.2, 6.2.
Task Length:
2000 words (equivalent)
Due Date:
Week 9
Weight:
40 %
 
 

CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Critically evaluate the benefits and challenges of play and inquiry-based pedagogies, integrating key concepts of literacy, mathematics and science (30%)
LO1, LO3
2
Demonstrate a clear connection between pedagogical approaches and students' own professional experiences and contexts, offering practical examples and insights (30%)
LO2, LO3
3
Effectively incorporate academic literature to support arguments, ensuring a well-rounded critique that draws from credible sources (30%)
LO4
4
Utilise creative and flexible presentation techniques to engage the intended audience, communicating ideas clearly and professionally, with appropriate APA referencing (10%)
LO4
 
Assessment Task 3: AT3: Integrated Curriculum Design Project
Task Description:
The final Assessment Task [AT3] task enables students to apply and evaluate their knowledge by creating an integrated Curriculum Unit/Learning Sequence that incorporates elements of literacy, mathematics and science. This individual, summative assessment task involves the design of a curriculum plan relevant to their own professional teaching context to support young children (3- 8 years).

Students will demonstrate their ability to design and justify an authentic, inclusive and engaging curriculum plan that incorporates the following components.

1. Professional and Learner Contexts:
Provide a detailed summary of your professional teaching context, including an evaluation of key learner characteristics of the young children with whom you work, with connections to relevant data sources and literature.
2. Learning Objective and Outcomes:
Based on your contextual evaluation, develop one clear learning objective and select appropriate learning outcomes/content descriptors from a relevant curriculum framework that will support your learners in their literacy, mathematics and science development.
3. Curriculum Unit/Learning Sequence:
Design an age-appropriate and engaging curriculum Unit/Learning Sequence (i.e., 3 interrelated learning experiences/lessons) that aligns with your learning objective, outcomes and learner contexts. Remember to provide evidence of your chosen curriculum approaches, pedagogies and assessment strategies throughout the Unit/Sequence.
4. Curriculum content knowledge and skills:
Identify specific concepts and skills embedded in your Unit/Sequence that relate to literacy, mathematics and science; and illustrate how these concepts and skills will be unpacked with your learners during the Unit/Sequence and beyond.
5. Integrated Justification:
Provide a comprehensive justification for your curriculum decisions and design, with reference to key unit concepts and relevant scholarly literature to substantiate your approaches in curriculum design, pedagogy and assessment.

Additional Requirements and Information:
It is recommended that these files be Saved in accordance with University file-naming conventions, e.g., Smith_John-EDP707-AT3.

Students should also ensure that their name and student ID are listed clearly within their presentation file.

Standard descriptors for the assignment criteria are included in the AT3 assessment rubric, located in the Assignment section in MyLO.

Completion of this Assessment Task relates to the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APSTs): 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 5.1, 5.2, 6.4.
Task Length:
2000 words
Due Date:
Week 13
Weight:
40 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Provide a detailed evaluation of professional and learner contexts, effectively using relevant data and literature to inform curriculum design (15%)
LO1
2
Develop a clear learning objective and select appropriate learning outcomes/content descriptors that support literacy, mathematics and science development (15%)
LO2
3
Design an engaging and age-appropriate curriculum sequence, demonstrating alignment with learning objectives and a coherent integration of literacy, mathematics and science (35%)
LO3
4
Provide a comprehensive justification for curriculum decisions, using scholarly literature to substantiate approaches in design, pedagogy, and assessment (35%)
LO4
 
 
 

How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
Academic progress review
The results for this unit may be included in a review of your academic progress. For information about progress reviews and what they mean for all students, see Academic Progress Review in the Student Portal.
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
Academic integrity
Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see
Important Guidelines & Support.
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 

Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.
 
 
 

Required Resources
Required reading materials
You will need access to the following:
  • Australian Children's Education & Care Quality Authority [ACECQA] (2022). Belonging, being and becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia – V2.0, 2022. https://www.acecqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-01/EYLF-2022-V2.0.pdf
  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA] (2022). The Australian Curriculum – Version 9.0. https://v9.australiancurriculum.edu.au/
Reading Lists provide direct access to all material on unit reading lists in one place. This includes eReadings and items in Reserve. You can access the Reading List for this unit from the link in MyLO, or by going to the Reading Lists page on the University Library website.
 
Recommended reading materials
Please refer to the Reading List.
 
Other required resources