Unit Outline
CXA713
Transitioning to Community-Based Allied Health Practice
Semester 1, 2025
Angela Berndt
School of Health Sciences
College of Health and Medicine
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B

Unit Coordinator
Angela Berndt
Email: angela.berndt@utas.edu.au
 

What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
This unit consolidates knowledge and skills related to collaborative leadership and public health and synthesises them with skills and shared frameworks critical for allied health professionals working in community-based settings. Principles of population health and prevention and promotion strategies are used to examine the social needs or issues in a place or population group, prioritise issues for action, and match appropriate change action frameworks for population health in community-based practice settings. Through application of research and evidence-based practice skills, forms of health care entrepreneurship are examined as a context for students to develop entrepreneurial attributes, including creativity, innovation, ethical public health analysis and critical abilities needed for work readiness in our complex and ever-changing world.
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1
Synthesise relevant scientific literature to examine a chosen topic area related to a select population and demonstrate advanced writing skills in a Critically Appraised Topic review to report implications for professional practice in community settings.
2
Analyse professional, ethical, and social issues and needs related to select populations and evaluate their impact on professional practice in both public and private practice settings.
3
Demonstrate collaborative leadership and entrepreneurship while working with others to analyse and make an informed decision about an ethical problem of local and global population health importance.
4
Investigate key challenges and potential solutions to the health of populations at a local, national and international level.
5
Create innovative interprofessional service delivery proposals and evaluation plans that consider resource allocation, community needs, impact, and sustainability.
Alterations as a result of student feedback
In 2024, the physiotherapy PEP and speech pathology PEP dates led to some difficulty allocating students into balanced inter-professional learning groups.  However, those who were in IPL groups reported they enjoyed the experience. The 2024 cohort also reported high levels of appreciation for the WIL component of the unit being embedded in community settings working on relevant community issues.  
In 2025, the timing of the work integrated learning (WIL) hours has been adjusted to enable all students to be allocated into inter-professional groups; to start the WIL earlier and complete the WIL hours over an extended number of weeks.  
Also in 2025, we will align some of the research literacies learning between CXA713 and concurrent discipline specific units to maximise efficiencies for students. 
 
 

Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
On Campus
Workshop
Workshop On Campus (Residential School)
4
Study Period 2 times
Workshop
Online workshop
1
Study Period 6 times
Independent Learning
Guided learning on Mylo
3
Weekly
Other
Individual Study
1
StudyPeriod 10 times
Clinical or Professional Practice
Work Integrated Learning - 7.5 hours, Semester 5 times.
7.50
Study Period 5 times
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online or includes online activities, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline or MyLO, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 

How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
Case Study
Week 3
30 %
LO1, LO2, LO4, LO5
Assessment Task 2:
Critically Appraised Topic
Week 8
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5
Assessment Task 3:
Community Needs Assessment
Week 13
30 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5
 
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: Case Study
Task Description:
This assessment task requires students to examine systemic factors influencing allied health service delivery in public and private settings with a focus on health inequities and disparities. Students will respond to a series of questions that consider professional, ethical, and social issues related to the case study and propose a creative interprofessional service response plan that considers resource allocation, impact, and sustainability.
Task Length:
1500 words
Due Date:
Week 3
Weight:
30 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Evaluate and explain the systemic factors and social, economic, and environmental issues creating disparities in service delivery and health outcomes.
LO2, LO4
2
Differentiate professional and ethical considerations relevant to the select populations and/or practice contexts reflected in the case scenario.
LO2
3
Propose and justify a creative and sustainable interprofessional strategy to improve equity of service delivery.
LO1, LO5
 
Assessment Task 2: Critically Appraised Topic
Task Description:
Working in interprofessional groups of students, this Assessment Task requires students to undertake a modified Critically Appraised Topic (CAT) review of health promotion initiatives that relate to the community needs analysis.

Each student group will produce a Critically Appraised Topic (CAT) review document demonstrating research and advanced writing skills to report implications for allied health practice in community-based settings or at a population level. As a group, students will define a clear and focused question, develop a search strategy, identify relevant literature and critically appraise the evidence.

Individually, students will summarise the findings to propose a clinical bottom line or health promotion recommendation (1 page). Each student will submit a CAT review document with both group and individual components. Outcomes will be examined in terms of impacts on health and social outcomes at a community or population level.
Task Length:
3000 words
Due Date:
Week 8
Weight:
40 %
 
 

CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Use relevant scientific literature to critically examine the chosen topic area related to an identified community need.
LO1, LO2, LO3
2
Synthesise the characteristics and outcomes of effective health promotion and/or prevention strategies considering health, policy, and social impacts.
LO1, LO2, LO3
3
Use evidence to write a Critically Appraised Topic review document reporting the implications for interprofessional collaborative practice in community-based settings.
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5
 
Assessment Task 3: Community Needs Assessment
Task Description:
Community Needs Assessment.
This assessment task is attached to a Work Integrated Learning (WIL) experience, partnering with local Tasmanian organisations. The assessment task will be completed in interprofessional groups of 3-4 students.

Each group will be connected to a Tasmanian community issue relevant to the placement context and undertake a community needs assessment. The needs assessment should integrate principles of public health, socially determined health and equity.

The assessment task involves 3 parts.

Part A. Community Profile: Group Task
As a team, you are to define and characterise the community based on a needs analysis that considers community initiatives, human and social services, healthcare services, and main places of employment. Your community profiling / needs assessment will reflect the stages of the Community Level Professional Reasoning Framework (CL-PRF), including national and international comparisons of social and environmental contexts.

Part B. Health Promotion Plan
As a team, you will devise an innovative health promotion initiative or strategy addressing the identified community needs. As a team, you will create a video pitch that describes and justifies the proposal, presenting a clear and convincing capacity building case that could be presented to the partnering organisation and/or local council for consideration. The justification should consider resource allocation, impact, and sustainability.

Part C. Reflection
Each student is required to complete an individual critical reflection on the interprofessional project and their development of collaborative leadership capabilities.
Task Length:
1000 words, 15 minute pitch video and 500 word reflection
Due Date:
Week 13
Weight:
30 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Analyse a community’s social demographic and health, wellbeing indicators and social sectors.
LO1, LO2, LO3
2
Engage with stakeholders and complete a community need assessment that examines local policy, systems, and available services.
LO2, LO3
3
Devise and pitch an innovative and sustainable solution to strengthen public health policy, systems and environmental conditions for health.
LO3, LO4, LO5
4
Appraise own collaborative leadership capabilities to respond creatively to community need and influence public health.
LO3, LO4, LO5
 
 
 

How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
Academic progress review
The results for this unit may be included in a review of your academic progress. For information about progress reviews and what they mean for all students, see Academic Progress Review in the Student Portal.
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
Academic integrity
Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see
Important Guidelines & Support.
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 

Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.
 
 
 

Required Resources
Required reading materials
There are no required reading materials for this unit.
 
Recommended reading materials
Please refer to your reading list for recommended readings. You will be directed to the recommended readings as you work through each topic in Mylo.
 
Other required resources