| | | |
Weight: | 20 % |
|
CRITERION # | CRITERION | MEASURES INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOME(S) |
| | | 1 | Create an individualised professional portfolio that reflects your individuality and professionalism, and the professional standards of your chosen discipline. | LO1 | 2 | State professional identity aspirations with attention to a variety of potential practice scopes and philosophies using a growth mindset. | LO1, LO4 | 3 | Curate and present a range of reflections, learnings, and achievements that demonstrate reflective practice and critical appraisal of your developing knowledge, skills, and attributes in relation to your professional practice standards. | LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5 | 4 |
Use self-reflection to identify learning needs and present them in a structured context to inform your professional development. | LO3 |
|
|
|
Assessment Task 3: Interprofessional Communication and Ethical Reasoning |
Task Description: | Interprofessional Communication and Ethical Reasoning Part 1. Group video This task provides you the opportunity to work inter professionally to respond to ethical issues that you may experience as an allied health professional.
Part 2. Individual reflection
Watch at least one of the other group videos discussing a different scenario. This should be a different scenario than the one that your team presented on. Write a reflection comparing the ethical decision-making process of the different groups, their application of the Code of Ethics, and the communication skills used to complete the group task and to negotiate an outcome. |
Task Length: | Part 1 – 10 minute video (group); Part 2 - 500 word written reflection (individual) |
Due Date: | See the MyLO site for the due date |
Weight: | 30 % |
|
CRITERION # | CRITERION | MEASURES INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOME(S) |
| | | 1 | Contribute to the group task and use your teamwork and communication skills to consider how the dilemma could best be resolved. | LO1, LO2, LO3 | 2 | Describe and analyse the ethical considerations raised in the scenario referring to the Code of Ethics of each profession. | LO1, LO2 | 3 | Describe the resolution to the ethical dilemma and justify it with reference to the values and principles in the Code of Ethics of each profession. | LO2, LO3 | 4 | Use reflective practice to analyse and describe the ethical decision-making process, and the collaborative group processes and communication skills that were required. | LO1, LO2, LO3 |
|
|
|
Assessment Task 4: Case Scenario |
Task Description: | You are required to apply a biopsychosocial, social determinants of health, person-centred approach and principles of evidence-based practice to ensure equitable, safe and quality services to analyse a practice scenario and a proposal for a specific intervention. |
Task Length: | |
Due Date: | See the MyLO site for the due date |
Weight: | 40 % |
|
CRITERION # | CRITERION | MEASURES INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOME(S) |
| | | 1 | Demonstrate a biopsychosocial, person-centred, culturally responsive approach. | LO2, LO4 | 2 | Identify the areas for intervention and analyse the safety, secondary prevention risks and health promotion opportunities. | LO2, LO5 | 3 | Appraise the level evidence for an intervention. | LO2 | 4 | Demonstrate understanding of interprofessional team roles and scope in managing client safety, secondary prevention and promoting health. | LO1, LO5 | 5 | Evaluate processes that ensure safe and quality service provision. | LO5 |
|
|