Unit Outline
CXA211
Immunology
Semester 2, 2025
Nicole Ranson
School of Health Sciences
College of Health and Medicine
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B

Unit Coordinator
Nicole Ranson
Email: Nicole.Ranson@utas.edu.au
What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
 

This unit will give you a broad and detailed understanding of the immune system and its functions. The curriculum includes both theoretical and practical sessions focusing on the structure and development of the immune system, antigen presentation and recognition, effector mechanisms involved in pathogen clearance, infectious disease and vaccines, immune disorders such as autoimmune disease, hypersensitivity and immunodeficiencies, and the use of advanced immunological techniques to assess or manipulate the immune response.
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1
Discuss the key components of the normal innate and adaptive immune responses and differentiate between the different causes of abnormal immune responses.
2
Show competency in basic immunological technical skills and critically assess and analyse laboratory results.
3
Communicate effectively using appropriate scientific terminology.
Requisites
REQUISITE TYPE
REQUISITES
Pre-requisite
CZZ101 AND CZZ102
Alterations as a result of student feedback
No alterations have been made as a result of student feedback
 
 

Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
On Campus
Independent Learning
No Description
2
Weekly
Workshop
No Description
2
1 time per fortnight
Practical
No Description
3
1 time per fortnight
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online or includes online activities, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline or MyLO, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 

How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
Laboratory Practical Reports
Week 3
30 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
Assessment Task 2:
Quizzes
Week 5
15 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
Assessment Task 3:
Mid-semester test
Week 7
15 %
LO1, LO3
Assessment Task 4:
Examination
Exam Period
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
 
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: Laboratory Practical Reports
Task Description:
This activity requires you to perform immunological procedures/experiments and submit individual reports for three experiments. Reports need to include experimental data, clinical interpretation and answers to post laboratory questions.
Task Length:
On-going throughout semester
Due Date:
Week 3
Weight:
30 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Provide a scientific justification that demonstrates knowledge of theoretical aspects of principles of both innate and adaptive immunity, as applied to practicals.
LO1
2
Demonstrate immunological assay technical skills.
LO2
3
Analyse data from laboratory experiments to draw conclusions.
LO2
4
Explain the results of the experiments through scientific writing.
LO3
 
Assessment Task 2: Quizzes
Task Description:
Two multiple choice quizzes. Each quiz will consist of 20 questions and cover unit content from weeks 1-4 and 5-10 respectively.
Task Length:
30 minutes per quiz (x 2 quizzes)
Due Date:
Week 5
Weight:
15 %
 

 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Explain the principles of basic immunology, including normal innate and adaptive immune responses.
LO1
2
Assess and analyse laboratory results to identify and explain abnormal immune responses.
LO2
3
Communicate using discipline- specific terminology.
LO3
 
Assessment Task 3: Mid-semester test
Task Description:
Test consisting of multiple choice and short answer questions comprising all material up to end of Week 6.
Task Length:
60 mins
Due Date:
Week 7
Weight:
15 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Demonstrate knowledge of innate and adaptive immune system principles.
LO1
2
Use discipline specific terminology to explain immunological principles.
LO3
 
Assessment Task 4: Examination
Task Description:
This is a closed book paper-based exam, where you will be required to demonstrate your individual ability to communicate and apply theoretical and practical knowledge.
Task Length:
3 hours
Due Date:
Exam Period
Weight:
40 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Synthesise the principles of innate and adaptive immunity to explain health and disease.
LO1
2
Discuss laboratory techniques and results to explain the basis of disease and extrapolate to clinical indications.
LO2
3
Communicate using discipline specific terminology and scientific writing skills
LO3
 
 
 

How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
Academic progress review
The results for this unit may be included in a review of your academic progress. For information about progress reviews and what they mean for all students, see Academic Progress Review in the Student Portal.
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
Academic integrity
Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see
Important Guidelines & Support.
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 

Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.