Unit Outline

This unit introduces fundamental programming skills, developing students' ability to think algorithmically to solve problems and to express their ideas in well-constructed Python code. Beginning with the fundamental characteristics of computers and how they represent information, the unit develops the concepts of data types, variables, expressions (calculations), statements (actions), and text-based input and output. Building on these low-level constructs, the unit examines ways to manage program complexity with control structures (for making decisions), functions and their parameters, built-in and custom data structures, and higher-level organisational mechanisms such as modules. Students will have the opportunity to explore advanced topics such as error handling and recursion.

Intended Learning Outcomes

As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.

On completion of this unit, you will be able to:


1.	apply code reading and debugging techniques to analyse, interpret, and describe the purpose of program code, and to identify and correct errors in syntax, logic, and/or style
2.	apply the principles of structured programming to the design and implementation of algorithms as computer programs
3.	construct small programs that include the use and creation of functions, lists, and other data structures
4.	apply functional decomposition to algorithms, document the resulting design, and implement the design as programming modules and functions

Requisites


REQUISITE TYPE	REQUISITES
Anti-requisite (mutual excl)	JEE101 XPD124

Alterations as a result of student feedback

The working language for the unit has been changed to Python, and the two in-class workshop tests have been consolidated into the portfolio work.

Teaching arrangements


ATTENDANCE MODE	TEACHING TYPE	LEARNING ACTIVITY	CONTACT HOURS	FREQUENCY
On Campus	Independent Learning	Involving reading, listening to audio, watching video, and/or completing exercises and/or quizzes, self-study is individual work undertaken when the student chooses (i.e. asynchronous), most likely through engagement with MyLO. The content is examinable, and may need to be completed prior to attending classes and/or attempting assessment tasks.	2	Weekly
	Workshop	A structured real-time (i.e. synchronous) activity that involves a mix of presentation of new information/ideas/skills and guided activities related to that information/ideas/skills. All students are expected to attend.	2	Weekly
	Computer Laboratory	A structured real-time (i.e. synchronous) computer-based activity in a small-group setting where the primary purpose is the clarification, exploration or reinforcement of subject content presented or accessed at another time or place (e.g. lecture, preparatory work). It is teacher supported and may involve student-teacher and/or student-student interaction and dialogue for achievement of its learning outcomes. The students enrolled in the class are expected to attend. Begins in Week 2.	2	Weekly

Attendance / engagement expectations

If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.

How will I be Assessed?

For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.

Assessment schedule


ASSESSMENT TASK #	ASSESSMENT TASK NAME	DATE DUE	WEIGHT	LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:	Learning Reflection Report	Week 13	10 %	LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 2:	Advanced Portfolio	Week 13	40 %	LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 3:	Pass Portfolio	Week 13	50 %	LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4

Assessment details

Assessment Task 1: Learning Reflection Report

Task Description:

A reflection report on what you have learned in the unit using the supplied report template. The quality of this reflection determines your numerical mark within the grade for which you have qualified (based on the portfolio tasks completed). A draft should be submitted during Week 12 to receive feedback before submitting the final version.

Task Length:

Typically 2-4 pages

Due Date:

Week 13

Weight:

10 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Describe how each of the unit’s learning outcomes has been met with reference to portfolio tasks completed	LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
2	Express ideas in your own words, citing any ideas or descriptions derived from other sources	LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4

Assessment Task 2: Advanced Portfolio

Task Description:

In addition to the pass-level work, you have the opportunity to extend your abilities with portfolio tasks at CR, DN, and HD levels. These introduce more sophisticated techniques and debugging exercises together with the opportunity to design and implement a program of your own design.

Completion of all tasks of a particular level and those below it qualifies you for that final grade. Achieving a High Distinction requires that the HD Program task is completed, with an optional HD Project allowing achievement of a higher mark within the HD band. Students potentially qualifying for HD must demonstrate and explain their custom HD program to a member of the teaching team.

Task Length:

Varies by task, but typically 1-2 source files (more for DN and HD custom programs) and 1-5 pages of documentation

Due Date:

Week 13

Weight:

40 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Identify and document faults in more complex code samples and suggest appropriate corrections	LO1
2	Correctly apply structured programming principles of sequence, selection, and repetition as required by the task	LO2
3	Implement all required functionality using the full range of programming techniques taught in the unit (in programming tasks)	LO3
4	Implement software as a collection of interacting functions given a plan	LO3, LO4
5	Devise own plan for implementing software as a collection of functions	LO4
6	Prepare external documentation for a program of your own design	LO4
7	Adhere to the unit’s coding style for layout, variable names, and commenting	LO2, LO3
8	Demonstrate and discuss the implementation of your custom program	LO4

Assessment Task 3: Pass Portfolio

Task Description:

Throughout the semester you will work on a collection of learning tasks (categorised as PP, CR, DN, or HD level), submitting these for feedback as you complete them.

The PP-level tasks demonstrate pass-level achievement in the unit. Tasks are assigned a status to indicate if further revision is required, the work is nearing completion subject to discussion with your tutor, or they are complete. Completed tasks count toward passing the unit.

Each task has a suggested completion week and a point later in semester after which no further corrective feedback will be given via MyLO, which varies by task, so you will need to be submitting (and revising) tasks most weeks.

Task Length:

Varies by task, but typically a single source file or 1-6 pages of text using a provided template

Due Date:

Week 13

Weight:

50 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Describe how program state changes in provided code samples	LO1
2	Select appropriate data types for modelling different phenomena	LO1
3	Identify faults in provided code samples and suggest appropriate corrections	LO1
4	Correctly apply structured programming principles of sequence, selection, and repetition as required by the task	LO2
5	Implement all required functionality using specified techniques (in programming tasks)	LO3
6	Implement software as a collection of interacting functions given a plan	LO3, LO4
7	Devise own plan for implementing software as a collection of functions	LO4
8	Adhere to the unit’s coding style for layout, variable names, and commenting	LO2, LO3

How your final result is determined

To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.

Submission of assignments

Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.

Requests for extensions

If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.

A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.

The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.

Late penalties

Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.

Review of results and appeals

You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.