Unit Outline
KHA505
Professional Ethics and Practice
Semester 1, 2024
Kimberley Stuart
School of Psychological Sciences
College of Health and Medicine
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B

Unit Coordinator
Kimberley Stuart
Email: Kimberley.Stuart@utas.edu.au
 

What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
In this unit participants develop and clarify their awareness and thinking around ethical and practice dilemmas within professional counselling practice. Emphasis will be placed on the development of personal standards of practice and on the acquisition and application of decision-making processes. Contemporary counselling practice obligations and issues such as the demands of maintaining competence and quality assurance; working as a counsellor within diverse settings and with diverse populations and the provision of consultancy will be addressed. Ethical thinking, codes of practice for counsellors and rehabilitation counsellors and approaches to applying these codes to actual practice dilemmas will be explored, with particular attention paid to current and developing areas of ethical challenge.
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1.
Apply ethical principles and professional obligations involved in contemporary counselling practice.
2.
Integrate relevant ethical codes, guidelines and/or principles to inform evidence-based opinions and decision-making processes to address professionally relevant ethical dilemmas.
3.
Reflect on the professional and personal requirements for the maintenance of ethical practice and develop strategies to sustain this.
Requisites
REQUISITE TYPE
REQUISITES
Concurrent Pre-requisite
KHA501
Alterations as a result of student feedback
The addition of three online workshops and review of assessment tasks based on student feedback. 
 
 

Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
Online
Online Class
Online discussion (synchronous)
2
Study Period 4 times
Online Class
Online module content (asynchronous)
4
Weekly
Individual Study
2 hours self-directed learning weekly
2
Weekly
Workshop (Online)
3 x 3-hour mandatory online workshops per semester
3
Study Period 3 times
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 

How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
Ethics presentation
Week 7
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
Assessment Task 2:
Topic Paper
Week 10
40 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
Assessment Task 3:
Discussion posts (online)
Week 13
20 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
 
Assessment details
    
Assessment Task 1: Ethics presentation
Task Description:
This task involves selecting an ethical dilemma faced by a counsellor. You will deliver a 15-20 minute presentation including a role play.

Task Length:
15 - 20 minutes
Due Date:
Week 7
Weight:
40 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Clear articulation of presenting problems and challenges
LO1
2
Knowledge of appropriate Codes and Guidelines and how they apply to the case
LO1, LO2
3
Detailed description and rationale of the decision-making process
LO1, LO2
4
Ability to address the ethical dilemma in practice as demonstrated through the role play
LO3
 
Assessment Task 2: Topic Paper
Task Description:
Use an ethical decision-making model to determine a course of action in response to common ethical and professional dilemmas encountered by counsellors.

Task Length:
2000 words (max) (excluding references)
Due Date:
Week 10
Weight:
40 %
 
 

CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Demonstrate a clear understanding of the ethical principles involved in the chosen area, including the complexity of situations faced by counsellors
LO1
2
Application of appropriate ethical principles, codes, and guidelines
LO2, LO3
3
Application of appropriate literature, including research. Level of breadth and critical engagement with literature
achieved.
LO1
4
Demonstrate professional communication through the development of a coherent logical argument and clear structure of the paper
LO1, LO2, LO3
5
Cognisance and articulation of personal and professional strategies
LO3
 
Assessment Task 3: Discussion posts (online)
Task Description:
Online participation in discussions on MyLO. There will be discussion questions released on MyLO on five occasions throughout the semester. You will need to contribute at least three posts of at least 100 words to the discussion.

Task Length:
3 posts of at least 100 words for each post (total of at least 300 words)
Due Date:
Week 13
Weight:
20 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Demonstrates a clear understanding of ethical principles and decision making, including referring to the relevant ethical codes, guidelines, or principles.
LO1
2
Demonstrates an understanding of the professional obligations involved in contemporary counselling practice
LO1, LO2
3
Discusses ways to handle ethical dilemmas in practice, including acknowledging the complexity of situations faced in counselling practice
LO3
4
Discusses professional and personal strategies for the maintenance of ethical practice
LO1, LO3
 
 
 

How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
 
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
 
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 
Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.
 
 
 

Required Resources
Required reading materials
You will need the following text:
Corey, G., Corey, M. S. & Corey, C. (2015). Issues and ethics in the helping professions. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
 
Recommended reading materials
Heller Levitt, D. & Hartwig Moorhead H. J. (Eds.) (2013). Values and ethics in counselling: real-life ethical decision making. New York: Routledge (electronic resource – UTAS Library)
 
Other required resources