| | | |
Weight: | 15 % |
|
CRITERION # | CRITERION | MEASURES INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOME(S) |
| | | 1 | Map style chosen communicates findings in a manner that is useful and applicable to a protected areas conservation audience. | LO1, LO3 | 2 | The cartographic components of the map produced have been used appropriately and using expected disciplinary norms.
| LO1, LO3 | 3 | The map symbology chosen is suitable to the context and communication of the data and themes expressed in the final output. | LO1, LO3 |
|
|
|
Assessment Task 3: Plan logic - map and results chain presentation |
Task Description: |
To begin to develop a shared understanding of our overall plan objectives and recommended results chains as the core of a management plan, you will individually present a data analysis. You will show how this data analysis relates to our class management plan and results chain. Presentations will be made in-class for on-campus students and recorded and shared online for distance students.
|
Task Length: | |
Due Date: | Week 8 |
Weight: | 10 % |
|
CRITERION # | CRITERION | MEASURES INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOME(S) |
| | | 1 | Technically sound diagnosis of management problem | LO1, LO2 | 2 | Well-analysed relationship between management plan, plan objective, and recommended actions | LO1, LO2 | 3 |
Competent manipulation of software and other data analytical and presentation tools to communicate findings. | LO1 |
|
|
|
Assessment Task 4: Management plan |
Task Description: |
This task is a field-based management plan. Using your field-collected data and/or class-generated products to diagnose the threats to conservation values and appropriate management actions, you will present a professional management plan. Key elements of a management plan that must be presented logically are plan values, context (e.g. relevant policy), objectives, and actions. These should be supported by core figures including maps, results chain, and analyses of field data.
|
Task Length: | ~1500-2000 words plus required visual figures such as map, results chain, and other supporting analytical figures. |
Due Date: | Week 9 |
Weight: | 35 % |
|
CRITERION # | CRITERION | MEASURES INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOME(S) |
| | | 1 | Plan consistency and feasibility: your plan is achievable and can be implemented by a land holder or manager, using the logical steps provided in your management plan. | LO2, LO3 | 2 |
Management plan elements: you have included plan values, context (e.g. relevant policy), objectives, and actions using the conventions and techniques demonstrated in this unit. | LO1, LO3 | 3 | Professionally presented: core figures including maps, results chain, analyses of field data and written elements have been produced using the conventions and techniques demonstrated in this unit, and are of your own creation. | LO2, LO3 |
|
|
|
Assessment Task 5: Group management plan
|