Unit Outline

Object Design is a School of Creative Arts and Media (CAM) unit, designed for college students who have successfully completed, or are demonstrating excellent progress in, Design and Production (or an equivalent subject). The program is project-based. Students work with teachers in their colleges completing design activities, engaging with iterative practices and methods, and working toward a creative response to the project brief. Students will be required to produce a major design piece or proposition for assessment, supported by a project journal, design proposal and reflective statement. Completed student works will be presented at a group exhibition in a gallery setting, which will also form the basis of the assessment process. Assessment will be undertaken by University of Tasmania staff in collaboration with teachers associates. UTAS teaching facilitators scaffold learning and teaching activities by supporting students and associate teachers through college visits, excursions and by providing online resources.

Intended Learning Outcomes

As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.

On completion of this unit, you will be able to:


1.	Explore and utilise a range of design methods and skills to create an experimental and/or speculative project that responds to a design brief
2.	Select and apply technical skills and techniques relevant to the design/creative project
3.	Engage with and transpose theoretical, creative and/or historical contexts into the development and evaluation of ideas, concepts and processes
4.	Develop and employ approaches that communicate critical reflections on project iterations, outcomes and achievements through written, and visual modes

Alterations as a result of student feedback

How will I be Assessed?

For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.

Assessment schedule


ASSESSMENT TASK #	ASSESSMENT TASK NAME	DATE DUE	WEIGHT	LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:	Task 3: Design Reflection	Refer to Assessment Description	20 %	LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 2:	Task 1: Design Proposal	Refer to Assessment Description	30 %	LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 3:	Task 2: Final Design Project for Exhibition	Refer to Assessment Description	50 %	LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4

Assessment details

Assessment Task 1: Task 3: Design Reflection

Task Description:

A 500-word reflection which describes:
• your understanding of the design field,
• your development of skills in design thinking and making processes,
• your experience during the development and resolution of your final object design.

Date Due: Monday 14 October

Task Length:

500 words

Due Date:

Refer to Assessment Description

Weight:

20 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Describe a field of practice that has inspired your design process	LO3, LO4
2	Reflect on the challenges and successes of your approaches to your project through writing	LO4
3	Evidence development of skills and engagement with feedback through iterative practice	LO1, LO2, LO3

Assessment Task 2: Task 1: Design Proposal

Task Description:

You will develop a design proposal that responds to the theme. The design proposal is written in a template and does not exceed 500 words.
You are encouraged to approach the theme from a variety of perspectives. You will document your design process through journaling, writing and other creative approaches such as material investigations.
Your journal and project documentation should identify references and/or influences that inform the direction of a theme-based project and indicate how the chosen design medium is suitable for investigating the theme.

Your design proposal is an indication of the directions you set out to take. It is normal in design, however, for projects to evolve in ways that are not anticipated. Your design proposal should not prevent you from re-evaluating your initial intentions and shifting direction if justified.

Due Date: Friday 3 May 2024

Task Length:

UP TO 500words and images with good resolution. *If you use a video or audio file, the maximum length should be two minutes. *Total files maximum size 1GB. Templates are available on MyLO

Due Date:

Refer to Assessment Description

Weight:

30 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Evidence research analysis through a variety of visual and scholarly sources in response to a brief	LO1, LO2, LO3
2	Communicate ideas employing visual and written forms	LO4
3	Show how ideas and design methods transform into form, material and/or functionality	LO1, LO2, LO3

Assessment Task 3: Task 2: Final Design Project for Exhibition

Task Description:

Up to 200 -word Design Statement, Research Journal and Final Design Object:
A. The design satement (up to 200 words)\ describes your response to the design brief and the processes you have undertaken and will be displayed with your designed object.

B. The research journal documents your design process. In order to give it context, it must include visual examples and a short analysis of professional designers whose work have influenced the direction of your project. The journal also captures your design intent in a chronological order through sketches, material samples–where necessary, photographs of work in progress, and short reflections.

C. Design Object or proposition for exhibition

Due Date: Friday 13 September 2024

Task Length:

Research Journal: Hard copy or electronic; up to 200word Design statement; Design Object for exhibition.

Due Date:

Refer to Assessment Description

Weight:

50 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Evidence research analysis of a variety of visual and scholarly sources in response to the brief	LO1, LO3
2	Demonstrate iterative creative development using design methods and processes	LO1, LO2, LO3
3	Communicate ideas employing visual and written forms	LO4
4	Show how ideas and design methods transform into form, material and/or functionality	LO1, LO2, LO3
5	Resolve the design object through attention to detail in construction and finish	LO2

How your final result is determined

To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.

Submission of assignments

Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.

Requests for extensions

If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.

A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.

The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.

Late penalties

Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.

Review of results and appeals

You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.