Unit Outline
EPR301
Literacy and Numeracy 5 to 8 years
Semester 1, 2024
Lauren Armstrong
Faculty of Education
College of Arts, Law and Education
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B

Unit Coordinator
Lauren Armstrong
Email: Lauren.Armstrong@utas.edu.au
 

What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
Young children develop their abilities to communicate, make meaning, represent ideas, and problem-solve in many ways.  Literacy development begins at birth, while mathematical thinking flourishes as they begin to explore their world.  In this unit, you will explore the continuity of this learning in the early years of schooling, drawing upon significant theories that underpin this learning. You will examine early literacy and numeracy concepts, processes and pedagogies; and apply this knowledge to develop learning experiences suitable for diverse young learners. You will deepen your understanding about relevant national curricula (the Early Years Learning Framework and the Australian Curriculum); as well as reflect upon your own experiences and growing understandings about literacy and numeracy to plan for vibrant and inclusive learning encounters in Prep to Year Two.
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1.
Describe Literacy and Numeracy experiences suitable for diverse young learners drawing on theories of learning.
2.
Plan and design Literacy and Numeracy learning experiences based on relevant curricula and pedagogical approaches for diverse young learners.
3.
Justify and analyse the ways in which young children develop and learn Literacy and Numeracy across curricula.
4.
Reflect and contemplate current, prior, and future Literacy and Numeracy learning and practice for diverse learners aged 5 – 8
Alterations as a result of student feedback
  • Unit modules and weekly topics have been listed clearly in the Unit Guide and MyLO
  • The Reading List has been updated to align with current research, practice and industry perspectives.
     
 
 

Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
Online
Lecture (Online)
Engaging with the weekly 1–2-hr Lecture/Learning Seminars
2
Weekly
Independent Learning
Engagement with unit content, readings and materials
6
Weekly
Online Class
Sharing activity responses and engaging in collaborative discussions.
2
Weekly
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
In this unit, your active engagement will be monitored in the following way:
1.    Submission of regular posts 
2.    Engagement in group discussions
You are encouraged to engage with unit learning resources and discussion boards as early as possible. Remember that units are planned assuming (and recommending) an average of 10 hours engagement each week for each unit that you are enrolled in. If you are contacted by your Tutor, Unit Coordinator, Director of Student Engagement, or Head of School in relation to your level of engagement, please reply.
 
 
 

How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
Literacy and Numeracy learning and development in the Early Years
Week 5
35 %
LO1, LO2, LO3
Assessment Task 2:
Planning for Early Years Literacy and Numeracy using Case Studies
Week 9
35 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 3:
Reflection
Week 13
30 %
LO3, LO4
 
Assessment details
    
Assessment Task 1: Literacy and Numeracy learning and development in the Early Years
Task Description:
Students will be required to write an individual, summative essay that discusses learning theories that support and contribute to Literacy and Numeracy development from birth to age 8.
When developing this essay, students must:
1. Identify specific learning theories explored throughout your studies, and how these are visible within the processes of Literacy and Numeracy knowledge and skills for children aged between birth and age 8.
2. Summarise the key developmental phases for Literacy and Numeracy learning that occur during the Early Years (birth to age 8).
3. Describe how your understandings of Early Years theory and development can inform your professional practice in an Early Years (Early Childhood//Kindergarten/Prep-Year 2) classroom.
4. Identify and convey connections to relevant academic literature to support the discussion.
The assignment document should include word count and page numbers, and be saved and submitted as a Word/PDF file and named in the following format: Smith_John-EPR301-AT1.
Standard descriptors for the assignment criteria are included in the assessment rubric, located in the Assignment section in MyLO.

Completion of this Assessment Task relates to Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST) 1.1, 1.2, 2.5, 6.4

Task Length:
1400 words
Due Date:
Week 5 (25/Mar/2024)
Weight:
35 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Identify and discuss learning theories relative to Literacy and Numeracy within birth to age 8 (40%)
LO1, LO2, LO3
2
Explain Literacy and Numeracy development from birth to age 8 (40%)
LO1, LO2, LO3
3
Apply theoretical knowledge to early childhood context or educational setting (20%)
LO1, LO2, LO3
 
Assessment Task 2: Planning for Early Years Literacy and Numeracy using Case Studies
Task Description:
Students will be provided with three case studies that depict diverse learner contexts. This individual, summative task will require students to consider these cases carefully with a professional lens, and undertake the following:
1. Artefact selection and analysis:
Select, describe and analyse the suitability of one Literacy artefact and one Numeracy artefact (two in total) for each case. Remember to specify the case study which relates to each chosen artefact (350 words).
2. Designing learning experiences/lessons:
Use the artefact analysis to design one Literacy experience/lesson and one Numeracy experience/lesson (two in total) which cater to all three cases (350-word equivalence).
3. Justification:
Justify your professional decisions by making clear and relevant connections to key learning theories, developmental indicators, pedagogical approaches and academic literature (700 words).
Standard descriptors for the assignment criteria are included in the assessment rubric, located in the Assignment section in MyLO.

Completion of this Assessment Task relates to Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST) 1.1, 1.2, 1.5, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.5, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 5.1, 5.2, 5.4

Task Length:
1400 words
Due Date:
Week 9 (29/Apr/2024)
Weight:
35 %
 
 

CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Analyse Literacy and Numeracy artefacts (15%)
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
2
Use data to plan Literacy and Numeracy experiences for diverse learners (25%)
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
3
Justify pedagogical decisions in relation to Literacy and Numeracy theories (30%)
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
4
Explain pedagogical decisions relative to developmental indicators (30%)
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
 
Assessment Task 3: Reflection
Task Description:
This individual, summative task will require students to use evidence from the unit to write a reflective essay that responds to the following question:
In this unit, what key point have you learnt about Literacy and Numeracy
relative to diverse learners aged 5 – 8?
For this assignment, students will:
1. Critically reflect on what they have learnt from this unit to best support the development of Literacy and Numeracy knowledge and skills among diverse young learners (aged 5 to 8 years).
2. Consider and convey previous, existing and future approaches to Literacy and Numeracy learning and practice for diverse young learners (aged 5 to 8 years).
3. Justify how the learning theories associated with Literacy and Numeracy have enhanced your comprehension of effective pedagogical practice for the Early Years classroom.
4. Utilise support from relevant academic research and literature to support the discussion.

Standard descriptors for the assignment criteria are included in the assessment rubric, located in the Assignment section in MyLO.

Completion of this Assessment Task relates to Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST) 1.1, 1.2, 1.5, 2.5, 3.6,4.1, 6.1, 6.2, 6.4, 7.4

Task Length:
1200 words
Due Date:
Week 13 (27/May/2024)
Weight:
30 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Critically reflect upon own learning in relation to Literacy and Numeracy for diverse learners aged 5-8 (40%)
LO3, LO4
2
Use evidence from within the unit to reflect and discuss current, prior, and future Literacy and Numeracy learning and practice for diverse learners aged 5 – 8 (20%)
LO3, LO4
3
Justify the development in your own pedagogical understanding in relation to Literacy and Numeracy theories (40%)
LO3, LO4
 
 
 

How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
 
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
 
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 
Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.
 
 
 

Required Resources
Required reading materials
Reading Lists provide direct access to all material on unit reading lists in one place. This includes eReadings and items in Reserve. You can access the Reading List for this unit from the link in MyLO, or by going to the Reading Lists page on the University Library website.
You will need access to the following:
Australian Children's Education & Care Quality Authority [ACECQA] (2022). Belonging, being and becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia – V2.0, 2022. https://www.acecqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-01/EYLF-2022-V2.0.pdf  
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA] (2022). The Australian Curriculum – Version 9.0. https://v9.australiancurriculum.edu.au/ 
 
Bilgen, Z., & Öztürk, Y. A. (2023). Investigation of Pedagogical Content Knowledge of In-service and Pre-Service Preschool Teachers in Pre-school Mathematics. International Journal of Progressive Education, 19(5), 126–152. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2023.603.9
Briggs, M. & Davis, S. (2014). Cross-curricular links [Chapter 8, pp.93-109]. In Creative teaching: Mathematics in the primary classroom (Ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group [electronic resource]. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.utas.edu.au/lib/utas/detail.action?docID=1791206 
Burke, R., Sharp, H. & Field, C. (2018). Pedagogical Approaches to Teaching and Learning English: Connections with Critical Numeracy [Chapter 9, pp.167-196]. In M. Sellar (Eds.) Numeracy in Authentic Contexts: Making Meaning Across the Curriculum. Springer Nature Singapore [electronic resource]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5736-6
De Leon-Pineda, J. L., & Prudente, M. (2022). Using online journals to improve the teaching of reflection among preservice math teachers. Reflective Practice, 23(3), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2022.2029737 
Dui, L. G., Toffoli, S., Speziale, C., Termine, C., Matteucci, M., & Ferrante, S. (2022). Can Free Drawing Anticipate Handwriting Difficulties? A Longitudinal Study. 2022 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI), Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI), 2022 IEEE-EMBS International Conference On, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/BHI56158.2022.9926884
Duruk, E. (2023). A Phenomenological Approach towards Early Literacy Development Practices of Early Childhood Teachers. Journal of Language & Literature Studies, 28, 62–79. https://doi.org/10.30767/diledeara.1271570 
Erickson, J. D., Markmann, S., & Davison, K. E. (2023). Toward more motivationally-supportive reading interventions: Learning from young DLLs’ perceptions of English-only programmes. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984231186086 
Gabas, C., Cutler, L., & Schachter, R. E. (2023). Making Mistakes: Children’s Errors as Opportunities for Emergent Literacy Learning in Early Childhood. Reading Teacher, 76(6), 664–672.  https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2171 
Herbert, S., & Williams, G. (2023). Eliciting mathematical reasoning during early primary problem solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35(1), 77–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00376-9Hizli Alkan, S., & Sahin Ipek, D. (2023). Addressing Language Diversity in Early Years Mathematics: Proposed Classroom Practices through a Live Brief Assessment. Education Sciences, 13(10), 1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101025 
MacDonald, A. (2018). Theoretical bases for Early Childhood Mathematics Education [Chapter 3, pp.29-39], In Mathematics in Early Childhood Education, Oxford University Press, 2018. ProQuest Ebook Central. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.utas.edu.au/lib/utas/detail.action?docID=5407330 
Macdonald, K., Milne, N., Pope, R., & Orr, R. (2022). Evaluation of a 12-Week Classroom-Based Gross Motor Program Designed to Enhance Motor Proficiency, Mathematics and Reading Outcomes of Year 1 School Children: A Pilot Study. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50(5), 811–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01199-w 
Magnusson, M., Hofslundsengen, H., Jusslin, S., Mellgren, E., Svensson, A.-K., Heilä-Ylikallio, R., & Hagtvet, B. E. (2022). Nordic preschool student teachers’ views on early writing in preschool. International Journal of Early Years Education, 30(4), 714–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2021.1948820 
Murphy, C. (2016). Changing the way to Teach Maths: Preservice Primary Teachers’ Reflections on using Exploratory Talk in Teaching Mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 18(2), 29. https://search.informit.org/documentSummary;res=aeipt;dn=214301 
Norman, T., Pearce, W. M., & Eastley, F. (2021). Perceptions of a Culturally Responsive School-Based Oral Language and Early Literacy Programme. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 50(1), 158–167.
https://search-informit-org.ezproxy.utas.edu.au/doi/abs/10.3316/aeipt.229346 
Pahl, K. H., & Rowsell, J. (2011). Artifactual Critical Literacy: A New Perspective for Literacy Education. Berkeley Review of Education, 2(2), 129–151. 10.5070/B82110050. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6s0491j5 
Payet, P. R., & Ng Soo Boon. (2023). Cultivating Students Learning Motivation Through Mathematics Lessons in a Lower Primary School of Seychelles. Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research, 9(1), 109–118.
https://research.ebsco.com/c/nprl3q/viewer/pdf/erahr3xv2z 
Pratt, S. M., & Hodges, T. S. (2023). The Think-Aloud Observation Protocol: Developing a Literacy Instruction Tool for Teacher Reflection and Growth. Reading Psychology, 44(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2126572 
Roche, A., Downton, A., Cheeseman, J., & Ferguson, S. (2021). Imagining things in boxes. Prime Number, 36(3), 7. https://search.informit.org/documentSummary;res=AEIPT;dn=229845 
Russo, J., Bobis, J., Downton, A., Livy, S., & Sullivan, P. (2022). Using Enabling and Extending Prompts in the Early Primary Years When Teaching with Sequences of Challenging Mathematical Tasks. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED623752 
Scerif, G., Blakey, E., Gattas, S., Hawes, Z., Howard, S., Merkley, R., O, C. R., & Simms, V. (2023). Making the Executive ‘Function’ for the Foundations of Mathematics: The Need for Explicit Theories of Change for Early Interventions. Educational Psychology Review, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09824-3 
Sellar, M. (2018). Mathematics and Numeracy in a Global Society [Chapter 1, pp.5-21]. In M. Sellar (Eds.) Numeracy in Authentic Contexts: Making Meaning Across the Curriculum. Springer Nature Singapore [electronic resource]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5736-6    
Taylor, S. V., & Leung, C. B. (2020). Multimodal Literacy and Social Interaction: Young Children’s Literacy Learning. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00974-0 
Walker, S., & Berthelsen, D. (2017). Gender differences in early literacy and mathematics achievement and self-regulatory behaviours in the first year of school: An Australian study. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 42(1), 70. https://search.informit.org/documentSummary;res=AEIPT;dn=215373 
Weadman, T., Serry, T., & Snow, P. C. (2023). The oral language and emergent literacy skills of preschoolers: Early childhood teachers’ self‐reported role, knowledge and confidence. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 58(1), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12777 
Wohlwend, K. (2023). Serious Play for Serious Times: Recentering Play in Early Literacy 
 
Recommended reading materials

ACARA (n.d.). National Literacy and Numeracy Learning Progressions. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/resources/national-literacy-and-numeracy-learning-progressions/ 
DECYP, Tasmania (2023). Kindergarten-to-Year-2-Improvement-Approach-Guide. https://publicdocumentcentre.education.tas.gov.au/library/Shared%20Documents/Kindergarten-to-Year-2-Improvement-Approach-Guide.pdf
Literacy Advisory Panel [LAP] (2023). Lifting Literacy, Lifting Tasmania: The Community-wide Framework and Report – May 2023. https://www.dpac.tas.gov.au/literacy/home/framework-and-final-report 
National Partnership Tasmania (2014). Improving Literacy and Numeracy – Final Report, 14 February 2014. https://www.education.gov.au/download/2406/improving-literacy-and-numeracy-national-partnership-final-report-tasmania/3337/document/docx 
 
Other required resources