Unit Outline
EAL102
Foundations of Professional Learning
Semester 1, 2024
Laura Russian
Faculty of Education
College of Arts, Law and Education
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B

Unit Coordinator
Laura Russian
Email: Laura.Russian@utas.edu.au
 

What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
This unit introduces students to a range of frameworks and accreditation standards for trainers and teachers in applied learning settings. It equips students with the fundamental tools required to maximize learning in range of educational environments. The concepts of collegial constructive criticism and mentoring will be integral to this unit, and students will gain valuable knowledge in these critical processes through an analysis of their own professional strengths. This unit will also introduce students to ePortfolios, and enable them to develop the skills required to create a professional artifact, aligned with their particular context or guiding framework. Skills in this unit will equip students for ongoing professional development and learning as they progress in their course and career.
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1.
reflect on personal and professional capabilities and constructive feedback, and identify and justify resources for professional learning.
2.
apply professional teaching standards to define and analyse pedagogy.
3.
apply ePortfolio and other digital tools to portray rich evidence of teaching practice aligned with professional standards
4.
apply ethical and academic integrity principles to the use of information in order to manage and communicate ideas, complex concepts, and specialised knowledge to an intended audience.
Alterations as a result of student feedback
 
 
 

Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
Online
Tutorial (Online)
Synchronous discussions with Lecturer (Unit Coordinator) and peers.
1
Weekly
Independent Learning
Meaninful and timely participation in online discussion forums and related activities
1
Weekly
Lecture (Online)
Asynchronous recordings of weekly notes, and assessment task scaffolds.
1
Weekly
Individual Study
Reading set-texts and reviewing course materials
7
Weekly
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 

How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
Teacher Education Information Literacy Quiz
Week 3
5 %
LO4
Assessment Task 2:
Professional Standards Reflection
Week 5
45 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 3:
Peer Moderated ePortfolio: Professional Capabilities Alignment to Teaching Standards
Week 13
50 %
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
 
Assessment details
    
Assessment Task 1: Teacher Education Information Literacy Quiz
Task Description:
This quiz helps you to consolidate learning in relation to the Teacher Education Information Literacy (TEIL) module, in preparation for Assessment Task 2.

Completion of this Assessment Task relates to Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST) 3.5, 6.2

Task Length:
 
Due Date:
Week 3
Weight:
5 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
x
LO4
 
Assessment Task 2: Professional Standards Reflection
Task Description:
This formative assessment task puts into practice the basic Teacher Education Information Literacy (TEIL) skills from Module One and reinforces some of the literature essential for understanding the context and the procedures that you will use for the remainder of this unit and the course. You will be required to prepare and submit a 1500-word paper on the topic of:
“Explain the relevance of professional standards and reflective practice to your current teacher career stage”.
To complete this task, you are required to:
• Include your own perspective of the purpose and structure of professional teaching standards relevant to your own setting. You will present this perspective:
- as an academic argument, supporting your own ideas with those of others, and also,
- as one that is relevant to your own teaching career stage.
• Reflect on your professional learning in order to appraise alternative points of view and improve practice. To do this you will:
- apply the reflection techniques covered in the unit, and also,
- consider collegial discussion from the discussion boards in MyLO.
• Demonstrate your academic writing and APA writing style skills (TEIL module). You will do this by:
- presenting an introduction that outlines the background of the topic and explains to the reader what will follow in the text. You will also present a conclusion that summarises your ideas,
- presenting an argument that identifies relevant supporting ideas or perspectives,
- selecting and using resources from the literature introduced so far in the unit to support your claims, and,
- including a reference list supported by in-text citations to acknowledge the work of others (according to APA style).

Completion of this Assessment Task relates to Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST) 3.5, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4

Task Length:
1500 words
Due Date:
Week 5
Weight:
45 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
 

1
Explain and analyse the structure and purpose of professional teaching standards in educational settings (30%)
LO2, LO3
2
Apply reflection techniques to interpret and identify alternative perspectives on teaching and learning (30%)
LO1
3
Construct an argument from the synthesis of discussion and literature (20%)
LO3, LO4
4
Apply academic principles to the use of information, and literature to an intended audience (20%)
LO4
 
Assessment Task 3: Peer Moderated ePortfolio: Professional Capabilities Alignment to Teaching Standards
Task Description:
In this assessment task, you will describe a particular strength in your teaching to demonstrate your understanding of the relationship between teacher standards and your own personal and professional experiences and capabilities. You will utilise the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers, and/or the VET Practitioner Capability Framework, and/or other professional teaching standard framework that applies to your own context. You will also reflect on your learning both in relation to the task and to your educational practice.
To complete this task you should:
• Select a particular strength. That is, something that you do well in your teaching or personal professional practice.
• Describe the strength and the context in which it is applied. Outline what it is that you do to demonstrate the strength.
• Align the strength to a range of relevant teaching standards and consider the impact on student learning. For example, why is the strength important? How would you see it impacting on student learning?
• Provide evidence to support your claims. This evidence will be in the form of:
- artefacts collected from your teaching (or any other area that demonstrates your strength, e.g. the workplace). The artefacts should be incorporated into the text to show their connection to the standards and their direct support towards your claims.
- references to the unit (and other relevant) literature.
• Include a final reflection section that:
- demonstrates how the task (aligning your strength with appropriate standards) has influenced your own perspective on teaching and learning,
- outlines your professional learning needs, and considers positive steps that you can take to improve your own teaching practice and to improve student learning, and
- considers the importance of collegial feedback for your professional learning (in this course, and in your teaching practice). To do this you should submit a draft of your work to two student colleagues for comment and respond to their suggestions and recommendations. You should include this feedback and your own feedback to others as tangible evidence in your ePortfolio.
• Build on your academic skills. You will demonstrate this by:
- incorporating references following APA style,
- submitting your work in an ePortfolio webfolio format, and by
- including an introduction and conclusion to your work. The introduction is a great place to introduce your own professional background, including your current teaching stage. This will provide a context for your discussion of the standards (for example, in reference to a particular level, e.g. Graduate). The conclusion should be a brief paragraph that provides a succinct summary of the work.

Completion of this Assessment Task relates to Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST) 3.4, 3.5, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4

Task Length:
2500 words
Due Date:
Week 13
Weight:
50 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Justify professional skills and knowledge aligned to standards (25%)
LO1, LO2
2
Define and analyse teaching pedagogy utilising artefacts and academic literature (25%)
LO2, LO3
3
Reflect on professional strengths, evaluate, and critique collegial practice, and respond to constructive criticism (25%)
LO1
4
Construct an evidence-based portrayal of professional strength using ePortfolio and other digital tools (10%)
LO3
5
Apply academic and ethical principles to the use of information, literature, and digital technology to an intended audience (15%)
LO4
 
 
 

How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.
 
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
 
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
 
Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.
 
 
 

Required Resources
Required reading materials
Kemmis, R.B., & Atkins, L. (Eds.). (2014). Teaching in the VET sector in Australia. David Barlow Publishing.
Reading Lists provide direct access to all material on unit reading lists in one place. This includes eReadings and items in Reserve. You can also access the Reading List for this unit from the link in MyLO. 
 
Recommended reading materials
Adoniou, M., & Gallagher, M. (2017). Professional standards for teachers – what are they good for? Oxford Review of Education, 43(1), 109-126.
Brookfield, S. D. (1995).
Becoming a critically reflective teacher. Jossey Bass.
Brookfield, S. D. (2015).
The skillful teacher: On technique, trust and responsiveness in the classroom. Jossey-Bass. (Available as an eBook from the UTAS library).
Çimer, S. O. (2011).
The effect of portfolios on students' learning: Student teachers' views. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(2), 161-176.
Costantino, P. M., & De Lorenzo, M. D. (2009).
Developing a professional teaching portfolio: A guide for success (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Lynn, S. K. (2002). The winding path: Understanding the career cycle of teachers.
The Clearing House, 75(4), 179-182.
Mulcahy, D. (2003).
Teaching standards and professionalism in TAFE: Prospects, possibilities and pitfalls. Paper presented at The 6th AVETRA Annual Conference: The changing face of VET, Sydney. Available from http://www.avetra.org.au/Conference_Archives/2003/abstracts.shtml
Rocco, S. (2010). Making reflection public: Using interactive online discussion board to enhance student learning.
Reflective Practice, 11(3), 307-317.
Sachs, J. (2003). Teacher Professional Standards: Controlling or developing teaching?
Teachers and Teaching, 9(2), 175-186.
Shepherd, M. (2006). Using a learning journal to improve professional practice: A journey of personal and professional self-discovery. Reflective Practice, 7(3), 333-348.
 
Other required resources
Applied Learning units utilise ZOOM web-conferencing software. To ensure the best results, it is recommended that students have a USB headset.

All students automatically receive a PebblePad learning portfolio account and there are embedded access links within the unit. The utilisation of this ePortfolio platform provides an opportunity for students to appreciate alternative authentic evidenced assessment approaches from the perspective of the learner. All UTAS students retain access to the portfolio for three years cost free after graduation to develop their own professional evidence records.

Students also have access to the Office 365 suite of tools and applied learning units often make use of the Class Notebook function.