Unit Outline

Medical Laboratory Placement 1 & 2 (CXA412, CXA425) are two of three professional experience placement units (PEP) undertaken off campus in diagnostic pathology laboratories accredited by the National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA), or equivalent. You will experience core and specialised areas within a modern diagnostic pathology laboratory and develop a holistic view of the role of the diagnostic pathology laboratory in the health-care industry. You will further develop practical laboratory skills and learning (by observing and performing) and apply three years of undergraduate theory (university learning) to professional practice. You are subject to the rules and regulations of the host laboratory and supervised by laboratory staff. CXA412 comprises 4 weeks of PEP and CXA425 comprises 12 weeks of PEP. These units, along with CXA401 (Medical Laboratory Practice) comprise a full semester unit weighting You are responsible for managing your assessment workload during the 4th year semester, fitted in around full-time attendance at your hosting laboratory.

Intended Learning Outcomes

As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.

On completion of this unit, you will be able to:


1.	Analyse workplace procedures & protocols and evaluate the clinical and diagnostic significance.
2.	Reflect upon the effect of your work placement on your personal and professional presumptions and attitudes.

Requisites


REQUISITE TYPE	REQUISITES
Pre-requisite	CXA315, CXA300 and CXA301 Integrated Laboratory Medicine and [(CXA332 and CXA333) or (CXA342 and CXA343) or (CXA352)]
Co-requisite	CXA401 and CXA425

Alterations as a result of student feedback

How will I be Assessed?

For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.

Assessment schedule


ASSESSMENT TASK #	ASSESSMENT TASK NAME	DATE DUE	WEIGHT	LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:	Student Journal – Critical Incident Analysis reviews	Week 5	15 %	LO1, LO2
Assessment Task 2:	Student Journal - weekly entries	Week 14	40 %	LO1, LO2
Assessment Task 3:	Discussion Posts – pre & post-placement	Refer to Assessment Description	5 %	LO1, LO2
Assessment Task 4:	Laboratory Supervisor Assessment	Refer to Assessment Description	40 %	LO1, LO2

Assessment details

Assessment Task 1: Student Journal – Critical Incident Analysis reviews

Task Description:

Student Journal – Critical Incident Analysis reviews.
The CIA review will compare the weekly CIA entries for weeks 1, 2 & 3.

Task Length:

500 – 1000 words

Due Date:

Week 5

Weight:

15 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Compare and evaluate critical incidents.	LO2
2	Explain the impact of placement on professional and personal attitudes, aptitudes and presumptions.	LO1, LO2

Assessment Task 2: Student Journal - weekly entries

Task Description:

Student Journal – weekly entries - weeks 1 - 3 of placement.
a. Demonstrate the application of university theory to workplace practice
This task serves as evidence of your ability to apply your university-learned knowledge to the ‘real world’ of diagnostic pathology testing and analysis.
b. Reflect upon your placement experiences
You will identify, analyseanalyse, and evaluate experiences that occurred to you or that you witnessed during your placement in terms of your personal and professional presumptions (beliefs, opinions, biases) and expectations.
Refer to the Assessment and resources folder on MyLO (CXA41/425) for further details, templates to use and examples to assist you.

Task Length:

Weekly journal entries should be a maximum of 1500 words

Due Date:

Week 14

Weight:

40 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Analyse workplace procedures and protocols	LO1
2	Compare workplace procedures and protocols with prior university learning	LO1
3	Evaluate the clinical or diagnostic significance of laboratory activities	LO1
4	Describe the event you intend to critically analyse and evaluate	LO1
5	Analyse the event from professional and personal perspectives	LO1
6	Evaluate the event by outlining a course of future action or a plan for change	LO2

Assessment Task 3: Discussion Posts – pre & post-placement

Task Description:

Discussion Posts – pre & post-placement -
Pre-placement: After the pre-placement visit OR after the first day if you had no preplacement visit. • Post a brief description of your placement location and your initial perceptions and expectations about your placement experience on the MyLO discussion board. • Reply to at least one other posting Final week: • Post a description of how your presumptions have changed since your pre-placement visit posting and whether your expectations were realised. Give examples. How has the placement experience affected your post university plans? Reply to at least one other posting.

Task Length:

200 words each (minimum of four postings).

Due Date:

Refer to Assessment Description

Weight:

5 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Explain and reflect on your expectations and aspirations for PEP within the context of the laboratory and discipline.	LO1, LO2
2	Reflect on the PEP experience within the context of the laboratory and discipline.	LO1, LO2

Assessment Task 4: Laboratory Supervisor Assessment

Task Description:

Laboratory Staff Assessment -
Staff members responsible for student supervision will assess you on your technical aptitude, your theoretical knowledge, and your professional attitude, using the competency checklists and assessment sheets in the Placement Assessment & Documentation booklet, given to you at the pre-placement seminar.
NB: Communication skills carry the greatest assessment weighting for this task.

Task Length:

Due Date:

Refer to Assessment Description

Weight:

40 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Demonstrate technical aptitude, by correct use of laboratory equipment and adherence to correct procedure and by displaying newly acquired workplace skills and learning.	LO1
2	Demonstrate professional attitude, e.g. punctuality, self-motivation & enthusiasm, recognising when additional expertise is needed and ethical behaviour (confidentiality, sensitivity, integrity).	LO1
3	Demonstrate effective communication skills (interpersonal & non-verbal) when communicating with laboratory staff and associated work professionals.	LO1
4	Apply introductory practical and theoretical knowledge to interpret procedural and diagnostic components encountered in placement with the support of the PEP supervisor.	LO2

How your final result is determined

To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.

Submission of assignments

Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.

Academic integrity

Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see Important Guidelines & Support.

Requests for extensions

If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.

A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.

The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.

Late penalties

Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.

Review of results and appeals

You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.