Unit Outline

CSA722 is a self-directed, fully online unit, that explores a variety of disease states and their management, using a series of patient cases linked to assignment-based questions, to enable you to enhance your knowledge in clinical pharmacy and pharmaceutical care. This unit covers the medication management and clinical pharmacy issues in cardiovascular diseases.

Intended Learning Outcomes

As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.

On completion of this unit, you will be able to:


1.	Identify and evaluate problems associated with cardiovascular medicines using an evidence-based approach.
2.	Critically evaluate cardiovascular medication therapy using an evidence-based approach and accepted best clinical practice to devise and justify appropriate courses of action for therapeutic management.
3.	Employ evidence-based and contemporary clinical skills to conduct a clinical audit and demonstrate how this may influence pharmacy practice in the management of cardiovascular disease.
4.	Demonstrate effective written and oral presentation skills to explain contemporary issues associated with cardiovascular medication therapy

Requisites


REQUISITE TYPE	REQUISITES
Concurrent Pre-requisite	CSA721

Alterations as a result of student feedback

In response to the feedback from previous student cohort, changes have been made which may include adjustments to assessments and alignment of some of the timelines. As always, the teaching team will greatly appreciate your feedback both informally during the delivery of the unit in 2024, and formally through the University of Tasmania’s eVALUate surveys following your completion of the unit.

How will I be Assessed?

For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.

Assessment schedule


ASSESSMENT TASK #	ASSESSMENT TASK NAME	DATE DUE	WEIGHT	LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:	Quiz	Week 3	5 %	LO1
Assessment Task 2:	Assignment 1	Week 4	15 %	LO1, LO2, LO4
Assessment Task 3:	Assignment 2	Week 6	25 %	LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 4:	Assignment 3	Week 10	35 %	LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 5:	Assignment 4	Week 13	20 %	LO3, LO4

Assessment details

Assessment Task 1: Quiz

Task Description:

A quiz with multiple choice and short answer questions specific to cardiovascular diseases. You will be answering these questions using current guidelines and evidence from the literature.

Task Length:

30 minutes

Due Date:

Week 3

Weight:

5 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Apply knowledge based on current guidelines and evidence from the literature to answer cardiovascular questions.	LO1

Assessment Task 2: Assignment 1

Task Description:

Assignment 1 involves learning the basic principles of evidence-based practice and how it relates to a patient. You are expected to submit your assignment in a Word document (using a provided template) to the appropriate dropbox.

Task Length:

750 words

Due Date:

Week 4

Weight:

15 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Formulate a clinical question and PICO framework	LO1, LO2
2	Develop and execute a search strategy to locate relevant evidence from the academic literature.	LO1
3	Effectively communicate findings using academic writing conventions.	LO4

Assessment Task 3: Assignment 2

Task Description:

Assignment 2 is about the application of structured EBM to patient care and providing an evidence-based response to the health professional's request for information

Task Length:

1500 words

Due Date:

Week 6

Weight:

25 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Design and express a clinical question involving the case details.	LO1
2	Formulate search terms and execute a search strategy within a medical database.	LO1
3	Evaluate the quality of evidence and construct a response to the clinical query.	LO2, LO3
4	Effectively communicate findings using academic writing conventions.	LO4

Assessment Task 4: Assignment 3

Task Description:

Assignment 3 will involve answering specific clinical questions related to a clinical case. Additionally, you will discuss the practical relevance of this assignment.

Task Length:

3000 words

Due Date:

Week 10

Weight:

35 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Select relevant evidence-based literature, ensuring accurate referencing in responses.	LO1, LO2
2	Assess the relevant evidence and formulate a clinically informed response to address the stated issues.	LO2, LO3
3	Communicate using academic writing conventions.	LO4
4	Elaborate on the practice relevance gained from responding to the clinical case.	LO3

Assessment Task 5: Assignment 4

Task Description:

Assignment 4 involves conceptualising, developing, and presenting a PowerPoint clinical case presentation related to pharmacy practice within the context of cardiovascular disorders. To do this activity well, you will need a lot of preparation, research, facts and figures, and collaboration with colleagues.

How your final result is determined

To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.

Submission of assignments

Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.

Academic integrity

Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see Important Guidelines & Support.

Requests for extensions

If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.

A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.

The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.

Late penalties

Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.

Review of results and appeals

You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.

Required Resources

Required reading materials