Unit Outline
CNA514
Oncology Nursing 3
Semester 2, 2024
Carli Shaw
School of Nursing
College of Health and Medicine
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586B

Unit Coordinator
Carli Shaw
Email: carli.shaw@utas.edu.au
 

What is the Unit About?
Unit Description
In this unit students will undertake self-directed knowledge development through negotiated contracted learning. This learning will incorporate a review of literature around an area on oncology nursing of their choice in order to examine the patient experience of cancer and outcomes.
Intended Learning Outcomes
As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1.
Demonstrate the ability to advance professional knowledge and skills through independent self-directed learning.
2.
Show evidence of critical analysis of scholarly and evidenced based literature within chosen area of knowledge and skill development.
3.
Develop and implement a learning contract that demonstrates understanding of the principles of negotiated and independent life-long learning.
Alterations as a result of student feedback
Regular monitoring and review have been undertaken.
 
 

Teaching arrangements
ATTENDANCE MODE
TEACHING TYPE
LEARNING ACTIVITY
CONTACT HOURS
FREQUENCY
Online
Individual Study
Individual self-directed learning - 10 hours per week.
10
StudyPeriod 13 times
Online Class
Online webinar - 3 x 1 hour
1
Study Period 3 times
Attendance / engagement expectations
If your unit is offered On campus, it is expected that you will attend all on-campus and onsite learning activities. This is to support your own learning and the development of a learning community within the unit. If you are unable to attend regularly, please discuss the situation with your course coordinator and/or our UConnect support team.

If your unit is offered Online or includes online activities, it is expected you will engage in all those activities as indicated in the Unit Outline or MyLO, including any self-directed learning.

If you miss a learning activity for a legitimate reason (e.g., illness, carer responsibilities) teaching staff will attempt to provide alternative activities (e.g., make up readings) where it is possible.
 
 
 
 

How will I be Assessed?
 
For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.
Assessment schedule
ASSESSMENT TASK #
ASSESSMENT TASK NAME
DATE DUE
WEIGHT
LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:
Literature Review
Week 7
40 %
LO1, LO2
Assessment Task 2:
Peer Support & Review
Week 10
10 %
LO1, LO2
Assessment Task 3:
Completed Contract of Learning and portfolio of evidence of achievement
Week 13
50 %
LO2, LO3
 
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: Literature Review
Task Description:
The purpose of this assessment is for you to explore the literature on your particular topic related to the patient experience of cancer and outcomes.
Task Length:
2000 words
Due Date:
Week 7
Weight:
40 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Discuss any related theories or issues pertaining to your topic and application to practice
LO1, LO2
2
Summarise and synthesise relevant, scholarly literature. Include references that are recent, relevant, evidence-based and have broad scrutiny (peer-reviewed). Include the search strategy to locate appropriate literature.
LO1, LO2
3
Critically analyse the literature used to support the development of the literature review topic.
Draw conclusions you have concluded from your research in your own workplace.
LO1, LO2
4
Communicates clearly and succinctly using the current APA style.
LO1, LO2
 
Assessment Task 2: Peer Support & Review
Task Description:
Peer Support & Review.
Each student is to upload an abstract of their literature review onto their allocated discussion board. Discussion boards will open in Week 7 and close in Week 10.
Each student is required to add a short reflection to at least two other peers regarding the other students' findings from their review of the literature and what you have learnt.
Task Length:
200 - 250 words
Due Date:
Week 10
Weight:
10 %
 
 

CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Uploads abstract of literature review to peers and provides timely input on discussion board.
LO1, LO2
2
Participates in and reflects on at least 2 peers’ posts / threads on your allocated discussion board.
LO1, LO2
3
Provides relevant input and suggestions to discussions.
LO1, LO2
4
Communicates clearly and succinctly using the current APA style.
LO1, LO2
 
Assessment Task 3: Completed Contract of Learning and portfolio of evidence of achievement
Task Description:
Completed Learning Contract
Task Length:
2,000
Due Date:
Week 13
Weight:
50 %
 
CRITERION #
CRITERION
MEASURES INTENDED
LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
1
Provide a short overview (introduction) of the project, the overall aim for learning and the context in which it was undertaken; Includes the completed action plan following the introduction to the contract;
LO2, LO3
2
Presents substantial evidence of work meeting each learning objective to demonstrate advanced levels of knowledge attainment;
LO2, LO3
3
Critically analyse and discuss the process of meeting the learning contract objectives including any collaboration and unforeseen outcomes;
LO2, LO3
4
Includes a reflection of learning from completing the assessment tasks.
LO2, LO3
5
Includes reflection (using a model for reflection) on overall learning during learning contract, outcomes and future directions;
LO2, LO3
6
Includes appendices (copy of peer support and review discussions x 2 and any other documents as evidence for learning)
LO2, LO3
7
Be professionally presented, written and referenced.
LO2, LO3
 
 
 

How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, and achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater.
Submission of assignments
Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.
Academic integrity
Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see
Important Guidelines & Support.
Requests for extensions
If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.
 
A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.
 
The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.
Late penalties
Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.
Review of results and appeals
You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.
 
 

 
 

Required Resources
Required reading materials
Required Readings will be provided by your Unit Coordinator.
 
Recommended reading materials
Recommended Readings will be provided by your Unit Coordinator via the Reading List link in MyLO, or the unit Reading List on the University Library website.
 
Other required resources