Unit Outline

This unit is intended to integrate your knowledge and practice, preparing you to work as a beginning out-of-hospital practitioner. This unit will develop the research, ethical practice and professional development skills required of a health care professional, focusing on the integration of research and evidence into all facets of practice.

Intended Learning Outcomes

As per the Assessment and Results Policy 1.3, your results will reflect your achievement against specified learning outcomes.

On completion of this unit, you will be able to:


1	Defend the role of a critical enquiry-based model of professional practice, including the application of reflective practice and critical analysis of evidence
2	Evaluate research outcomes and incorporate them into evidence-based practice, whilst contributing to the body of research evidence that informs paramedic practice
3	Communicate outcomes and contribute to a culture of professional and academic enquiry
4	Collaborate with members of a team to achieve common goals using a range of communication techniques and processes

Requisites


REQUISITE TYPE	REQUISITES
Pre-requisite	CZZ103
Anti-requisite (mutual excl)	CAA309 (53A)

Alterations as a result of student feedback

How will I be Assessed?

For more detailed assessment information please see MyLO.

Assessment schedule


ASSESSMENT TASK #	ASSESSMENT TASK NAME	DATE DUE	WEIGHT	LINKS TO INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES
Assessment Task 1:	Peer review of contribution for each task	See the MyLO site for the due date	10 %	LO4
Assessment Task 2:	Conference Poster and Presentation	See the MyLO site for the due date	30 %	LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 3:	Background and introduction (project rationale)	Week 3	15 %	LO1, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 4:	Project Template	Week 8	30 %	LO2, LO3, LO4
Assessment Task 5:	Research reflection	Week 11	15 %	LO1, LO2, LO3

Assessment details

Assessment Task 1: Peer review of contribution for each task

Task Description:

Each member of the group must complete a peer assessment of the other members’ contributions to the project. A comprehensive rubric will be provided on MyLO. Your mark for this task will be calculated from the assessment of your peers.

See the MyLO site for the due date.

Task Length:

As per template on MyLO.

Due Date:

See the MyLO site for the due date

Weight:

10 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Contributes a fair and reasonable proportion of work to the research project (as determined by peers).	LO4
2	Collaborates effectively with peers during all aspects of the project	LO4

Assessment Task 2: Conference Poster and Presentation

Task Description:

As a group, you will prepare and present a conference poster that outlines your project’s outcomes.

See the MyLO site for the due date.

Task Length:

15 minutes plus questions

Due Date:

See the MyLO site for the due date

Weight:

30 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Poster: Includes and appropriate level of details and coverage of topic	LO1, LO2, LO4
2	Poster: Chooses suitable organisation, layout, and design	LO1, LO2, LO4
3	Poster: Uses correct spelling and grammar	LO1, LO2, LO4
4	Presentation: Includes clearly a defined introduction and ending	LO3, LO4
5	Presentation: Content included is both appropriate and underpinned by appropriate evidence	LO3, LO4
6	Presentation: Communication is clear and audible throughout the presentation	LO3, LO4

Assessment Task 3: Background and introduction (project rationale)

Task Description:

As a group, research and discuss the background to your project to provide context. You should identify the gaps in the existing literature that led to the need you intend to examine in your project. Your piece should also present and discuss the research question, including why you have chosen to study this particular question and how your project will attempt to provide a solution.

Task Length:

1000 words – (excluding reference list)

Due Date:

Week 3

Weight:

15 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Demonstrates knowledge of literature in the topic area, and of prior work on the specific research area.	LO1, LO4
2	Develops a precise and complete research question relevant to the topic area	LO1, LO4
3	Discusses the potential value of the solution or the contribution to advancing knowledge in the research area	LO1, LO4
4	Communicates in writing using correct grammar and appropriate terminology	LO3, LO4
5	Demonstrates effective selection, use, and management of references	LO3, LO4

Assessment Task 4: Project Template

Task Description:

As a group, you will complete and submit the template found on MyLO that is relevant to the project you are undertaking.

Task Length:

As per the template available on MyLO (1000 word equivalent)

Due Date:

Week 8

Weight:

30 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Develops a project plan that is comprehensive and feasible	LO2, LO3, LO4
2	Clearly outlines project within the relevant template	LO3
3	Communicates in writing using correct grammar and appropriate terminology	LO3, LO4
4	Demonstrates effective selection, use, and management of references	LO3, LO4

Assessment Task 5: Research reflection

Task Description:

Submit a document that reflects on how the project was improved in response to feedback. The reflection may also consider changes you would make if you were to repeat the process.

Task Length:

500 word reflection (excluding reference list)

Due Date:

Week 11

Weight:

15 %

CRITERION #

CRITERION

MEASURES INTENDED

LEARNING OUTCOME(S)


1	Discusses how reflective practice was implemented to inform development and improvement of research outcomes	LO1, LO2
2	Communicates in writing using correct grammar and appropriate terminology	LO3
3	Demonstrates effective selection, use, and management of references	LO3

How your final result is determined

To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended Learning Outcomes, achieve a final unit grade of 50% or greater, and pass any hurdle tasks.

Submission of assignments

Where practicable, assignments should be submitted to an assignment submission folder in MYLO. You must submit assignments by the due date or receive a penalty (unless an extension of time has been approved by the Unit Coordinator). Students submitting any assignment in hard copy, or because of a practicum finalisation, must attach a student cover sheet and signed declaration for the submission to be accepted for marking.

Academic integrity

Academic integrity is about acting responsibly, honestly, ethically, and collegially when using, producing, and communicating information with other students and staff members.

In written work, you must correctly reference the work of others to maintain academic integrity. To find out the referencing style for this unit, see the assessment information in the MyLO site, or contact your teaching staff. For more detail about Academic Integrity, see Important Guidelines & Support.

Requests for extensions

If you are unable to submit an assessment task by the due date, you should apply for an extension.

A request for an extension should first be discussed with your Unit Coordinator or teaching support team where possible. A request for an extension must be submitted by the assessment due date, except where you can provide evidence it was not possible to do so. Typically, an application for an extension will be supported by documentary evidence: however, where it is not possible for you to provide evidence please contact your Unit Coordinator.

The Unit Coordinator must notify you of the outcome of an extension request within 3 working days of receiving the request.

Late penalties

Assignments submitted after the deadline will receive a late penalty of 5% of the original available mark for each calendar day (or part day) that the assignment is late. Late submissions will not be accepted more than 10 calendar days after the due date, or after assignments have been returned to other students on a scheduled date, whichever occurs first. Further information on Late Penalties can be found on the Assessments and Results Procedure.

Review of results and appeals

You are entitled to ask for a review of the marking and grading of your assessment task if there is an irregularity in the marking standards or an error in the process for determining the outcome of an assessment. Details on how to request a review of a mark for an assignment are outlined in the Review and Appeal of Academic Decisions Procedure.